Skip to content

Fusion G31539Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Fusion Triple Lumen Needle Knife · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002315396), received between Mar 12, 2019 and Jan 13, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Fragmentation2
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 13, 2026Material Fragmentation

    DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP), THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK FUSION TRIPLE LUMEN NEEDLE KNIFE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NEEDLE BROKE OFF AND WAS INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE NEEDLE PIECE WAS REMOVED WITH FORCEPS. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION, AND NO PORTION WAS DETACHED. IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. A SECTION OF THIS DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN IN THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 24053880 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 8, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK FUSION TRIPLE LUMEN NEEDLE KNIFE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE, THE BLADE REMAINED IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT, DETACHING FROM THE DEVICE. THE CUSTOMER OPENED THE PACKAGE AND TESTED THE DEVICE, ALL WAS GOOD. ONCE IN GOOD POSITION, IN FRONT OF THE PAPILLA WITHOUT TOO MUCH BENDING, THEY INSERTED THE DEVICE INTO THE SCOPE CHANNEL AND THE PHYSICIAN ASKED TO DEPLOY THE NEEDLE, THEY STARTED TO CUT THE PAPILLA, BUT THE NEEDLE BROKE AND STAYED IN THE PAPILLA. THEY REMOVED THE NEEDLE, TOOK ANOTHER SYSTEM AND THEY FINISHED EXAMINATION WITHOUT PROBLEM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY, A PIECE OF THE NEEDLE DETACHED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON HOW IT WAS RETRIEVED. THE INITIAL REPORTER ALSO STATED THAT THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES, AND DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 22440276 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2019Break; Break

    DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP), THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK FUSION TRIPLE LUMEN NEEDLE KNIFE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE BROKE OFF AND WENT INTO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE COOK DISTRICT MANAGER ON 19-FEB-2019: AN ADDITIONAL DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED INDICATED THAT THE SECTION OF THE DEVICE WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. CLARIFICATION WAS RECEIVED ON 28-FEB-2019 AND INDICATED THAT THE CUSTOMER ATTEMPTED TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN PORTION BUT, THAT THEY WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PIECE OF THE BROKEN NEEDLE KNIFE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY TO PASS NATURALLY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 8413831 ↗

Other Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices

All Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page