Skip to content

Teslatome G60784Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Teslatome Bipolar Sphincterotome · Class 2

All models of Teslatome (2)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002607842), received between Nov 18, 2025 and Nov 21, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Structural Problem” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 2 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Dec 18, 2025Open, Classified

    Due to product that may contain a void in the material that separates the wire guide and cutting wire lumens, which may cause an inappropriate path of current during cutting.

    Z-1362-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Structural Problem2

Patient problems

  • Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s)1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Inappropriate Device Stimulation of Tissue1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 21, 2025Structural Problem; Structural Problem

    DURING AN ERCP, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK TESLATOME BIPOLAR SPHINCTEROTOME. THEY WERE CANNULATING WITH A WIRE UP THE PANCREATIC DUCT. THEY STRIPPED THE SPHINCTEROTOME BACK AND RELOADED WITH ANOTHER WIRE TO CANNULATE THE BILE DUCT. THE BILE DUCT WAS CANNULATED, AND THEY WENT TO DO THE SPHINCTEROTOMY. THEY STARTED THE SPHINCTEROTOMY. THEY MADE A LITTLE CUT. THEY REPOSITIONED AND WENT BACK TO START EXTENDING THE CUT. WHEN THEY STARTED TO CUT, THEY CUT THE GUIDE WIRE IN HALF. A PIECE OF THE GUIDE WIRE SPLIT THE TIP OF THE TOME AND CUT IT BACK TO THE GROUNDING PAD INK ON THE TOME. THEY REMOVED THIS DEVICE AND THE PIECE OF GUIDE WIRE THAT WAS UP IN THE BILE DUCT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER MANUFACTURERS SPHINCTEROTOME. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY FURTHER ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23618355 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 18, 2025Structural Problem; Structural Problem

    DURING AN ERCP, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK TESLATOME BIPOLAR SPHINCTEROTOME. THEY CANNULATE WITH AN OLYMPUS .025 VISIGLIDE WIRE GUIDE. THERE WERE THREE ATTEMPTED CUTS WITH THE TESLATOME. ON ALL 3 CUTS, PATIENT WAS NOTED TO ¿JOLT¿, AND HEART RATED ELEVATED. THE PHYSICIAN SWITCHED TO A ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S MONOPOLAR TOME TO FINISH THE CUT. THIS WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS. FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING THIS EVENT: WHAT WAS NOTED WAS A PHYSICAL JOLT OF THE PATIENT'S BODY EXTERNALLY. NOTHING INTERNALLY VIA THE ENDOSCOPE. THE AMPULLA WAS BEING WATCHED WHEN THEY WERE DOING THE CUTTING AND A TISSUE RESPONSE WAS NOTED. THE PHYSICIAN AND THE TECH NOTICED A ¿FULL BODY RESPONSE¿. THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST CONFIRMED THE PATIENT¿S HEART RATE ELEVATED IN THOSE INSTANCES. THE USERS STOPPED AND WE CONFIRMED THAT EVERYTHING WAS PLUGGED IN CORRECTLY. AN ADDITIONAL CUT WAS PERFORMED WITH THE SAME REACTION. IT WAS NOTED THERE WAS A STONE AT THE DOORWAY OF THE AMPULLA. WHEN THEY WERE CUTTING, THEY WERE CUTTING THROUGH A STONE. THERE WAS NO VISIBLE ARCING AND NO IMPLANTS IN THE PATIENT OTHER THAN HEMOCLIPS. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PAT

    Patient problems: Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s); Inappropriate Device Stimulation of Tissue

    MAUDE report 23586451 ↗

Other Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices

All Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page