Skip to content

Intracept FG 0043Recalls & reported problems

Relievant Medsystems, Inc. · Intracept RF Probe · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00852454006004), received between Feb 12, 2025 and Feb 12, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “High impedance” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 2 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • High impedance2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 12, 2025High impedance; High impedance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRACEPT PROCEDURE, THE PROCEDURE FACED ISSUES WITH HIGH IMPEDANCE ON THE ORIGINAL PROBE AT THE L5 VERTEBRAL BODY ON BOTH SIDES. THE PROBE WAS SWITCHED OUT WITH A NEW ONE. DESPITE CLEARING THE TRACT AND USING A NEW PROBE THE HIGH IMPEDANCES OCCURRED AGAIN BUT ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF L5. THE CURVED CANNULA ALSO BECAME STUCK IN L5, REQUIRING FORCE AND TWISTING IN ORDER TO REMOVE. THE PATIENT'S BONE WAS NOTABLY HARD. THE PEEK MATERIAL OF THE CURVED CANNULA SHEARED OFF IN THE LEFT SIDE OF L5. A NEW CURVED CANNULA WAS USED TO ACCESS THE RIGHT SIDE L5, IT ALSO SEEMED STUCK AND EVENTUALLY BROKE AT THE PROXIMAL END BUT WAS FULLY RETRIEVED WITH HEMOSTATS. THE PATIENT'S BONE ON THIS SIDE WAS NOT AS HARD BUT DENSE. THERE WERE NO DEVICE FRAGMENTS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. DUE TO THESE COMPLICATIONS, L5 WAS NOT ABLATED, AND L4 WAS NOT ATTEMPTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED. THE PATIENT HAD NO REPORTED COMPLAINTS BEFORE DISCHARGE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21367971 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 12, 2025High impedance; High impedance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRACEPT PROCEDURE, THE PROCEDURE FACED ISSUES WITH HIGH IMPEDANCE ON THE ORIGINAL PROBE AT THE L5 VERTEBRAL BODY ON BOTH SIDES. THE PROBE WAS SWITCHED OUT WITH A NEW ONE. DESPITE CLEARING THE TRACT AND USING A NEW PROBE THE HIGH IMPEDANCES OCCURRED AGAIN BUT ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF L5. THE CURVED CANNULA ALSO BECAME STUCK IN L5, REQUIRING FORCE AND TWISTING IN ORDER TO REMOVE. THE PATIENT'S BONE WAS NOTABLY HARD. THE PEEK MATERIAL OF THE CURVED CANNULA SHEARED OFF IN THE LEFT SIDE OF L5. A NEW CURVED CANNULA WAS USED TO ACCESS THE RIGHT SIDE L5, IT ALSO SEEMED STUCK AND EVENTUALLY BROKE AT THE PROXIMAL END BUT WAS FULLY RETRIEVED WITH HEMOSTATS. THE PATIENT'S BONE ON THIS SIDE WAS NOT AS HARD BUT DENSE. THERE WERE NO DEVICE FRAGMENTS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. DUE TO THESE COMPLICATIONS, L5 WAS NOT ABLATED, AND L4 WAS NOT ATTEMPTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED. THE PATIENT HAD NO REPORTED COMPLAINTS BEFORE DISCHARGE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21367938 ↗

Other Probe, Radiofrequency Lesion devices

All Probe, Radiofrequency Lesion devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page