Skip to content

DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TJF-150 (UDI 04953170307553)Recalls & reported problems

Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2

All models of DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE (2)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Quick summary

This Olympus duodenovideoscope is an endoscope used to view the bile and pancreatic ducts. Many of its 187 reports describe poor cleaning, residue after reprocessing, and cracks or breaks. There are 2 injury reports and no deaths. There is 1 open recall, from September 2023, over channels that may stay wet after repair. Reports rose from 42 in the year before to 84 in the latest year.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
189
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 189 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170307553), received between Apr 18, 2019 and Sep 17, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 187 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Clean Adequately” (64 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 2 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 3 reportsFeb 2025: 2 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 2 reportsMay 2025: 4 reportsJun 2025: 7 reportsJul 2025: 8 reportsAug 2025: 4 reportsSep 2025: 8 reportsOct 2025: 3 reportsNov 2025: 5 reportsDec 2025: 6 reportsJan 2026: 7 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 15 reportsApr 2026: 23 reportsMay 2026: 9 reportsJun 2026: 13 reportsJul 2026: 3 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202623
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Sep 25, 2023Class IIOpen, Classified

    Channel air drying process was not validated, and that a small percentage of scopes returned to customers after repair had a wet channel. Water remaining in the channel of the endoscopes has the potential for contamination that could lead to the risk of infection

    Z-0346-2024 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Clean Adequately64
  • Residue After Decontamination48
  • Crack17
  • Break14
  • Device Reprocessing Problem14
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material11
  • Contamination /Decontamination Problem7
  • Material Discolored7

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions170
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient15
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Pneumonia2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 189 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 17, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    The customer reported that the Duodenovideoscope had a separate issue. During the initial evaluation of the device, it was observed that the universal cord was sticky. There was no patient involvement.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50804318 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 15, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    The customer returned the Duodenovideoscope for a separate issue. During the initial evaluation of the returned device, it was observed that the forceps elevator wire had foreign objects. No patient involvement.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50775184 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 28, 2026Device Reprocessing Problem

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50500418 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 30, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50087779 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 29, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50067422 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 27, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50046010 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 24, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE INVESTIGATOR INDICATED THAT FOREIGN MATERIAL IN THE FORCEPS ELEVATOR WIRE WAS FOUND. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25606837 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 24, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE INVESTIGATOR INDICATED THAT FOREIGN MATERIAL IN FORCEPS ELEVATOR WIRE WAS FOUND. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25606784 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 24, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE INVESTIGATOR INDICATED THAT FOREIGN MATERIAL IN THE FORCEPS ELEVATOR WIRE AND A STAIN ON THE LIGHT GUIDE LENS WAS FOUND. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25606742 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 23, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR EVALUATION RELATED TO A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING TESTING, THE SERVICE REPAIR TECHNICIAN IDENTIFIED THE K-WIRE HAS FOREIGN OBJECTS. THE FOREIGN MATERIAL COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED, AND CAUSE COULD NOT BE ESTABLISHED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25600892 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 17, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR EVALUATION RELATED TO A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING TESTING, THE SERVICE REPAIR TECHNICIAN IDENTIFIED THE DEVICE HAD FOREIGN OBJECT ON FORCEPS ELEVATOR WIRE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25540602 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 10, 2026Material Fragmentation

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE SERVICE REPAIR TECHNICIAN INDICATED THAT A CHIP IN THE ADHESIVE AROUND THE LG LENS WAS FOUND. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25466087 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 10, 2026Pitted

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE INVESTIGATOR INDICATED THAT A CHIPPED ADHESIVE AROUND THE LIGHT GUIDE AND OBJECTIVE LENS WAS FOUND. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25459369 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 10, 2026Crack

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE INVESTIGATION INDICATES THE ADHESIVE OF THE LIGHT GUIDE AND OBJECTIVE LENSES WAS CHIPPED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25458656 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE TECHNICIAN INDICATED THAT THERE WERE FOREIGN OBJECTS ON THE KNOB WIRE DUE TO IMPROPER REPROCESSING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25397730 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 3, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE INVESTIGATOR INDICATES THAT FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS FOUND ON THE FORCEPS ELEVATOR WIRE, THE CAUSE OF WHICH COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25383786 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 1, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR AN UNRELATED ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, TECHNICIANS IDENTIFIED THAT THE KNOB WIRE CONTAINED FOREIGN OBJECTS. THE IDENTITY OF THE FOREIGN MATERIAL AND THE ROOT CAUSE OF WHY IT REMAINED IN THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE DEFINITIVELY DETERMINED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25355297 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 1, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR AN UNRELATED ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, TECHNICIANS IDENTIFIED THAT THE UNIVERSAL CORD WAS STICKY AND THE KNOB WIRE CONTAINED FOREIGN OBJECTS. BASED ON THE COMPLETED INVESTIGATION, THE IDENTITY OF THE FOREIGN OBJECT AND THE ROOT CAUSE OF WHY IT REMAINED IN THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE DEFINITIVELY DETERMINED. IT IS LIKELY THAT THE REPROCESSING DEVIATED FROM THE INSTRUCTION FOR USE. ADDITIONALLY, THE CAUSE OF THE STICKINESS ON THE UNIVERSAL CORD WAS NOT ESTABLISHED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25354956 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 1, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING TESTING, FOREIGN OBJECTS WERE IDENTIFIED ON THE FORCEPS ELEVATOR. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25350826 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 29, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE INVESTIGATOR INDICATES THAT THE ADHESIVE AROUND THE LIGHT GUIDE LENS AND OBJECTIVE LENS HAD CHIPPED, THE CAUSE OF WHICH COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25338251 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE DEVICE ANALYSIS, THE SERVICE REPAIR TECHNICIAN INDICATES THAT FOREIGN OBJECTS IN FORCEPS ELEVATOR WIRE WAS FOUND. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25297653 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    IT WAS OBSERVED DURING THE DEVICE INSPECTION, THAT THE GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE HAD FOREIGN MATERIAL ON THE FORCEPS ELEVATOR WIRE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25257950 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 6, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    IT WAS OBSERVED THAT DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE HAD FOREIGN MATERIAL IN THE FORCEPS ELEVATOR WIRE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25101618 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 6, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    IT WAS OBSERVED THAT DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE EXHIBITED FOREIGN MATERIAL IN K-WIRE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25100361 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 5, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, FOREIGN OBJECTS WERE OBSERVED ON THE DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE'S KNOB WIRE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25080690 ↗

Other Endoscopic video imaging system/component, gastroenterology-urology devices

All Endoscopic video imaging system/component, gastroenterology-urology devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page