THUNDERBEAT 5 mm, 20 cm, Inline Grip TB-0520ICRecalls & reported problems
Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170308710), received between Dec 27, 2018 and Apr 18, 2025 — classified as 11 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break4
- Peeled/Delaminated4
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Fracture1
- Material Separation1
- Melted1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 18, 2025Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE CUSTOMER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21866380 ↗MalfunctionApr 18, 2025Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE CUSTOMER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21866258 ↗MalfunctionApr 18, 2025Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE CUSTOMER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21865011 ↗MalfunctionMar 24, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
AN OLYMPUS EMPLOYEE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF A CUSTOMER, THE THUNDERBEAT TISSUE PAD CAME OFF DURING SURGERY. THE UNSPECIFIED THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A REPLACEMENT DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16616280 ↗MalfunctionNov 10, 2022Break; Break
AS REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT BY THE CUSTOMER, AT THE BEGINNING OF A THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE FOR THYROID, ONE OF THE JAWS OF THE DEVICE BROKE OFF AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT. THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW SIMILAR DEVICE. IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THERE WAS A DELAY IN THE COMPLETION. THERE IS NO HARM OR ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE SURGEON IS A REGULAR USER OF THE DEVICE AND WAS SURPRISED BY THE FAILURE OF THE DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15768481 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2022Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC LAPAROTOMY PROCEDURE, THE TISSUE PAD WAS PEELING OFF. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE OF THE SAME MODEL. THERE WAS NO HEALTH HAZARD TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL DETAILS HAVE BEEN REQUESTED REGARDING THE REPORTED EVENT. AT THIS TIME, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15262247 ↗MalfunctionFeb 1, 2022Break; Break
AS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER FOR THIS EVENT, DURING AN UNKNOWN THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR SOUNDED AN ALARM FOR THE DEVICE. ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO DISCONNECT AND RECONNECT THE DEVICE, BUT THE DEVICE WOULD NOT WORK. A JAW OF THE DEVICE THEN FELL INTO THE OPERATING SITE. THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETRIEVED. THERE IS NO HARM OR ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13414130 ↗MalfunctionMar 12, 2020Break; Break
DURING AN OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY WITH INFERIOR VENA CAVA THROMBECTOMY, THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS USED. AROUND FOUR TO FIVE HOURS AFTER THE START OF THE PROCEDURE, AN UNSPECIFIED ERROR OCCURRED. THE NURSE EXAMINED THE SUBJECT DEVICE OUTSIDE THE PATIENT AND CONFIRMED THAT IT WAS INTACT. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS CHECKED WITH THE GENERATOR AGAIN AND IT PASSED THE TEST. WHEN THE USER PUT THE SUBJECT DEVICE INSIDE THE INSTRUMENT POUCH, THE BOTTOM JAW BROKE OFF. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THIS IS THE REPORT REGARDING THE BREAKAGE OF THE BOTTOM JAW.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9822473 ↗MalfunctionJul 29, 2019Melted; Melted
SERVICE CENTER WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A DIAGNOSTIC, COAG, SIGMOID COLECTOMY PROCEDURE THE SILICON LAYER ON THE JAWS OF THE DEVICE MELTED. THE DEVICE AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WERE INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND NO ABNORMALITIES OBSERVED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT GENERATOR SETTING WAS 1-1 AND NO ERROR CODES DISPLAYED ON THE GENERATOR WHEN THE EVENT OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8837082 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT A SCHEDULED THERAPEUTIC COLONOSCOPY PROCEDURE WAS NEVER PERFORMED BECAUSE THE HAND-PIECE WAS FOUND TO HAVE THE TEFLON PAD HANGING OFF. THE HAND-PIECE WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND THAT IS WHEN THE DAMAGE WAS NOTICED. THE DEVICE WAS NEVER USED ON THE PATIENT. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8600307 ↗MalfunctionDec 27, 2018Break; Break
DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS USED. THE TISSUE PAD WAS BURNED. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. AS THE RESULT OF EVALUATION ON (B)(6) 2018, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE TISSUE PAD WAS SEVERELY WORN. THIS IS THE REPORT REGARDING THE SEVERELY WORN TISSUE PAD.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8201446 ↗
Other Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices
- THUNDERBEAT 5 mm, 35 cm, Front-actuated Grip TB-0535FCOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall2 deaths404 reports
- SONICBEAT 5 mm, 35 cm, Front-actuated Grip SB-0535FCOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)379 reports
- Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-611LOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 death357 reports
- Autotome™ RX 44 M00545170Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall262 reports
- TRUEtome 44 M00584170Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)237 reports
- Dreamtome™ RX 44 M00584040Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall165 reports
- Dreamtome™ RX 44 M00584050Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall127 reports
- Single Use 3-Lumen Sphincterotome V KD-V411M-0725Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)160 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page