Single Use 3-Lumen Sphincterotome V KD-V411M-0720 (REF N5411330)Recalls & reported problems
Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2
All models of Single Use 3-Lumen Sphincterotome V (31)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
Quick summary
This Olympus Single Use 3-Lumen Sphincterotome V is a disposable endoscopic cutting device used during procedures such as ERCP. There are 25 adverse event reports naming this device, mostly describing the sphincterotome or its knife wire breaking or bursting during use or setup, with no deaths and no injuries reported. One recall is open, started in January 2026, because some devices were not properly thermoformed and could deform and lose performance.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 25
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 25 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170380570), received between Nov 9, 2018 and Nov 19, 2025 — classified as 25 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (18 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Jan 7, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified
Devices which did not undergo thermoforming could deform and lose performance.
Z-1272-2026 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break18
- Material Split, Cut or Torn5
- Peeled/Delaminated2
- Burst Container or Vessel1
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
- Sparking1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions24
- Insufficient Information1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 25 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 19, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THE SINGLE USE 2-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME WIRE IS BROKEN. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23596028 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2025Break; Sparking; Break; Sparking
IT WAS REPORTED; THE SUBJECT DEVICE HAD THREE DIFFERENT SPHINCTEROTOMES "BURST". THE ISSUE WAS FOUND DURING SET UP AND INSPECTION FOR USE. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21707593 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2025Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM CUSTOMER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21691830 ↗MalfunctionMar 24, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SPHINCTEROTOME BURST. THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING SET UP. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21680125 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT DEVICE'S KNIFE WIRE BROKE WHEN THE CURRENT WAS APPLIED CONTINUOUSLY. REPORTEDLY, THE CURRENT WAS APPLIED BUT IT WAS DIFFICULT TO CUT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE WITHOUT ANY DELAY. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20855486 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE KNIFE BROKE WHEN POWER WAS APPLIED. THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A BACK UP DEVICE. NO REPORTS OF HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20855191 ↗MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THE KNIFE WIRE OF THE SPHINCTEROTOME BROKE. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20125779 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SINGLE-USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V WAS BROKEN. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING PRE-USE FOR A BILIARY ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY. WHEN PERFORMING AN INSERTION TEST INTO THE DUODENOSCOPE FORCEPS AND NO ELECTRICITY WAS BEEN APPLIED, THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS CONCLUDED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19828205 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SINGLE-USE 2-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME¿S KNIFE BROKE WHEN THE HANDLE WAS OPERATED USING THE DEVICE. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC BILIARY ENDOSCOPY SPHINCTEROTOMY. THE KNIFE DID NOT FALL OUT OF THE BODY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS FINISHED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19554617 ↗MalfunctionJun 5, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THE SINGLE USE 2-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME INCISION FUNCTION SUDDENLY BECAME IMPOSSIBLE AND THE WIRE WAS FOUND TO HAVE BEEN BROKEN. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC THORACIC SYMPATHECTOMY (ETS) PROCEDURE. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT OR USER HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19473000 ↗MalfunctionJun 3, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THE LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME HAD A KNIFE WIRE THAT WAS ALREADY CUT. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19445829 ↗MalfunctionMay 22, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED, THE KNIFE OF THE SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME WAS BROKEN. THE ISSUE HAPPENED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT OR USER HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19372629 ↗MalfunctionFeb 15, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE KNIFE COATING OF THE SPHINCTEROTOME WAS BROKE. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC SPHINCTEROTOMY. NORMAL SETTINGS WERE USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR IMPACT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18711383 ↗MalfunctionDec 1, 2023Break; Break
THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE SPHINCTEROTOME WAS IN USE WITH AN ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT IN ENDOCUT MODE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE SPHINCTEROTOME KNIFE WIRE BROKE. THE CUSTOMER COULD NOT CONFIRM WHETHER IT FELL OFF. THE SPHINCTEROTOME WAS CHANGED TO ANOTHER DEVICE AND THE THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE SPHINCTEROTOME WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND NO ISSUES WERE NOTED. NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO PATIENT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18248370 ↗MalfunctionNov 14, 2023Break; Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE KNIFE OF THE SPHINCTEROTOME BROKE OFF. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY PROCEDURE. WHEN THE SURGEON WAS CUTTING THE PAPILLA, THE KNIFE SUDDENLY BROKE OFF. THE HANDLE OF THE CLEVERCUT WAS REMOVED AND THE SURGEON INSERTED A CATHETER TO THE PLASTIC SHEATH OF THE CLEVERCUT BEFORE REMOVING IT FROM THE SCOPE IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PATIENT AND THE SCOPE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS OPENED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT DELAY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR IMPACT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18129479 ↗MalfunctionOct 16, 2023Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
AN OLYMPUS EMPLOYEE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF A CUSTOMER, DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP), (3) SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V WERE USED TO COMPLETE A PROCEDURE. WHEN THE FIRST SPHINCTEROTOME WAS INSERTED INTO THE TJF SCOPE, THE MEDICAL STAFF SAW THE CLEVERCUT COATING WAS CRACKED THROUGH THE ENDOSCOPIC VIEW. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND A NEW DEVICE OPENED. THE SECOND SPHINCTEROTOME WAS INSERTED INTO THE TJF SCOPE, THEY SAW THAT THE CLEVERCUT COATING WAS ALSO CRACKED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING A THIRD SPHINCTEROTOME. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. RELATED PATIENT IDENTIFIER: (B)(6).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17940285 ↗MalfunctionOct 16, 2023Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
AN OLYMPUS EMPLOYEE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF A CUSTOMER, DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP), (3) SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V WERE USED TO COMPLETE A PROCEDURE. WHEN THE FIRST SPHINCTEROTOME WAS INSERTED INTO THE TJF SCOPE, THE MEDICAL STAFF SAW THE CLEVERCUT COATING WAS CRACKED THROUGH THE ENDOSCOPIC VIEW. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND A NEW DEVICE OPEN. THE SECOND SPHINCTEROTOME WAS INSERTED INTO THE TJF SCOPE, THEY SAW THAT THE CLEVERCUT COATING WAS ALSO CRACKED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING A THIRD SPHINCTEROTOME. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. RELATED PATIENT IDENTIFIER: (B)(6).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17939857 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2023Break; Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO OLYMPUS, THE SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V WAS INSPECTED BEFORE USE AND THE TIP KNIFE WAS BROKEN. THE ISSUE WAS FOUND DURING PROCEDURE, AND THE THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE (EST) WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17647462 ↗MalfunctionAug 16, 2023Break; Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO OLYMPUS THE SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V KNIFE WIRE BROKE DURING THE FIRST ENERGIZATION. THE REPORTED ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY (EST) PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT/USER HARM OR INJURY REPORTED DUE TO THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17559764 ↗MalfunctionAug 8, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO OLYMPUS, THE SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V TIP KNIFE WIRE WAS CUT WHEN PRODUCT WAS OPENED IN THE PRE-USE INSPECTION. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING PREPARATION FOR USE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17484806 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2023Break; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Break; Material Split, Cut or Torn
AN OLYMPUS EMPLOYEE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF A CUSTOMER, DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP), THE KNIFE WAS TORN DUE TO ENERGIZATION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A REPLACEMENT DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17389663 ↗MalfunctionJul 14, 2023Break; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Break; Material Split, Cut or Torn
AN OLYMPUS EMPLOYEE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF A CUSTOMER, DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLARY SPHINCTEROTOMY WHEN THE KNIFE WIRE WAS ENERGIZED, IT BROKE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A REPLACEMENT DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17330282 ↗MalfunctionFeb 14, 2023Break; Break
AS REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT BY THE DISTRIBUTOR, DURING A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY (EST) WHEN A HIGH FREQUENCY WAS OUTPUT, THE DEVICE KNIFE WIRE BROKE, BUT DID NOT FALL OFF, AT THE FIRST ENERGIZATION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE OF THE SAME MODEL. THERE IS NO HARM OR ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE MODE AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT IS UNKNOWN, BUT THE LIKELY MODE MAY HAVE BEEN EITHER END CUT 1 EFFECT 3 INCISION TIME 3 OR INCISION INTERVAL FORCED COAGULATION EFFECT 2, MAXIMUM WATTAGE 40.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16375674 ↗MalfunctionSep 24, 2022Break; Break
AS REPORTED, WHEN ENERGIZED TO PERFORM A THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY (EST) IN AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOT ENERGIZED AT THE TIME OF THE FIRST OUTPUT. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE HOWEVER, WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER SIMILAR DEVICE (KD-V411M-0720). THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM, NO USER INJURY REPORTED DUE TO THE EVENT. ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE HIGH FREQUENCY (HF) UNIT USED WITH THE SUBJECT DEVICE NOTED TO BE MODEL VIO300D. ENERGIZATION TIME (AVERAGE) IS 1 SECOND OR LESS. DEVICE EVALUATION FOUND THE KNIFE WIRE WAS BROKEN. THIS REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED FOR BROKEN KNIFE WIRE FOUND ON DEVICE EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15481376 ↗MalfunctionNov 9, 2018Fluid/Blood Leak
WHEN INJECTING DYE INTO THE SPHINCTEROTOME, A LEAK IN THE TOME WAS NOTED. THE SPHINCTEROTOME HAD TO BE REMOVED AND A NEW ONE WAS USED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8054582 ↗
Other Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices
- THUNDERBEAT 5 mm, 35 cm, Front-actuated Grip TB-0535FCOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall2 deaths404 reports
- SONICBEAT 5 mm, 35 cm, Front-actuated Grip SB-0535FCOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)379 reports
- Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-611LOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 death357 reports
- Autotome™ RX 44 M00545170Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall262 reports
- TRUEtome 44 M00584170Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)237 reports
- Dreamtome™ RX 44 M00584040Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall165 reports
- Dreamtome™ RX 44 M00584050Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall127 reports
- Single Use 3-Lumen Sphincterotome V KD-V411M-0725Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)160 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page