Skip to content

Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-655 KD-655U (UDI 04953170405648)Recalls & reported problems

Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2

All models of Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-655 (6)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170405648), received between Jul 11, 2023 and Aug 22, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Melted1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
  • Perforation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2025Melted; Melted

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE DUAL KNIFE MELTED AFTER ABOUT 4 HOURS OF PROCEDURES. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE (SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION DIAGNOSING), WHICH WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE WITHOUT DELAY. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22873115 ↗
  • InjuryNov 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE TITLED "OUTCOMES OF ENDOSCOPIC SUB-MUCOSAL DISSECTION IN LATERALLY SPREADING COLORECTAL POLYPS: A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE EXPERIENCE FROM INDIA". LITERATURE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: ENDOSCOPIC SUB-MUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD) IS AN ESTABLISHED ENDOSCOPIC MODALITY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COLORECTAL POLYPS. HOWEVER, THERE ARE NO STUDIES REGARDING THE OUTCOMES OF ESD FROM INDIA. IN THIS STUDY, WE AIMED AT EVALUATING THE OUTCOMES OF ESD IN PATIENTS WITH ADENOMATOUS POLYPS IN THE COLON AND RECTUM. METHODS: DATA OF CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT ESD FOR COLORECTAL POLYPS FROM 2018 TO 2021 WERE ANALYZED, RETROSPECTIVELY. THE PRIMARY OUTCOME OF THE STUDY WAS THE TECHNICAL SUCCESS OF ESD. THE SECONDARY OUTCOMES INCLUDED THE RATE OF HISTOLOGICALLY COMPLETE RESECTION (R0), ADVERSE EVENTS AND RECURRENCE. RESULTS: SEVENTY PATIENTS (63.5 YEARS, 60% MALES) UNDERWENT ESD FOR POLYPS IN COLON AND RECTUM. A MAJORITY WERE LOCATED IN RECTUM (80%) AND SIGMOID COLON (15.7%). NARROW BAND CLASSIFICATION OF THE POLYPS WAS JAPANESE NARROW BAND IMAGING EXPERT TEAM (JNET)-2A IN 50 (71.4%) AND JNET-2B IN 13 (18.6%) PATIENTS. ESD WAS TECHNICALLY SUCCESSFUL IN 64 (91.4%) PATIENTS U

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Perforation

    MAUDE report 20787236 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE TIP BROKE OFF AND FELL OFF DURING PROCEDURE. THE DOCTOR BELIEVES IT MAY HAVE BEEN SUCTIONED SINCE IT WAS NOT VISIBLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A SIMILAR DEVICE AND THERE WAS NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19016895 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 11, 2023Break; Break

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS OPENED, AND USED BEFORE IT WAS DEEMED DEFICIENT AS THE OPEN AND CLOSE FUNCTION OF THE NEEDLE WOULD NOT WORK AND NEEDLE WOULD NOT EXTEND PAST THE TIP OF THE CATHETER. THE REPORTED ISSUE WAS OBSERVED DURING AN UNSPECIFIED THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM. THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER INJURY REPORTED DUE TO THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17303459 ↗

Other Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices

All Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page