Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-655 KD-655U (UDI 04953170405648)Recalls & reported problems
Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2
All models of Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-655 (6)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170405648), received between Jul 11, 2023 and Aug 22, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Melted1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- Perforation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 22, 2025Melted; Melted
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE DUAL KNIFE MELTED AFTER ABOUT 4 HOURS OF PROCEDURES. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE (SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION DIAGNOSING), WHICH WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE WITHOUT DELAY. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22873115 ↗InjuryNov 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE TITLED "OUTCOMES OF ENDOSCOPIC SUB-MUCOSAL DISSECTION IN LATERALLY SPREADING COLORECTAL POLYPS: A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE EXPERIENCE FROM INDIA". LITERATURE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: ENDOSCOPIC SUB-MUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD) IS AN ESTABLISHED ENDOSCOPIC MODALITY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COLORECTAL POLYPS. HOWEVER, THERE ARE NO STUDIES REGARDING THE OUTCOMES OF ESD FROM INDIA. IN THIS STUDY, WE AIMED AT EVALUATING THE OUTCOMES OF ESD IN PATIENTS WITH ADENOMATOUS POLYPS IN THE COLON AND RECTUM. METHODS: DATA OF CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT ESD FOR COLORECTAL POLYPS FROM 2018 TO 2021 WERE ANALYZED, RETROSPECTIVELY. THE PRIMARY OUTCOME OF THE STUDY WAS THE TECHNICAL SUCCESS OF ESD. THE SECONDARY OUTCOMES INCLUDED THE RATE OF HISTOLOGICALLY COMPLETE RESECTION (R0), ADVERSE EVENTS AND RECURRENCE. RESULTS: SEVENTY PATIENTS (63.5 YEARS, 60% MALES) UNDERWENT ESD FOR POLYPS IN COLON AND RECTUM. A MAJORITY WERE LOCATED IN RECTUM (80%) AND SIGMOID COLON (15.7%). NARROW BAND CLASSIFICATION OF THE POLYPS WAS JAPANESE NARROW BAND IMAGING EXPERT TEAM (JNET)-2A IN 50 (71.4%) AND JNET-2B IN 13 (18.6%) PATIENTS. ESD WAS TECHNICALLY SUCCESSFUL IN 64 (91.4%) PATIENTS U
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Perforation
MAUDE report 20787236 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE TIP BROKE OFF AND FELL OFF DURING PROCEDURE. THE DOCTOR BELIEVES IT MAY HAVE BEEN SUCTIONED SINCE IT WAS NOT VISIBLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A SIMILAR DEVICE AND THERE WAS NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19016895 ↗MalfunctionJul 11, 2023Break; Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS OPENED, AND USED BEFORE IT WAS DEEMED DEFICIENT AS THE OPEN AND CLOSE FUNCTION OF THE NEEDLE WOULD NOT WORK AND NEEDLE WOULD NOT EXTEND PAST THE TIP OF THE CATHETER. THE REPORTED ISSUE WAS OBSERVED DURING AN UNSPECIFIED THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM. THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER INJURY REPORTED DUE TO THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17303459 ↗
Other Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices
- THUNDERBEAT 5 mm, 35 cm, Front-actuated Grip TB-0535FCOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall2 deaths404 reports
- SONICBEAT 5 mm, 35 cm, Front-actuated Grip SB-0535FCOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)379 reports
- Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-611LOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 death357 reports
- Autotome™ RX 44 M00545170Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall262 reports
- TRUEtome 44 M00584170Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)237 reports
- Dreamtome™ RX 44 M00584040Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall165 reports
- Dreamtome™ RX 44 M00584050Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall127 reports
- Single Use 3-Lumen Sphincterotome V KD-V411M-0725Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)160 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page