UroMax Ultra M0062251080Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of UroMax Ultra (11)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729341185), received between Jan 15, 2019 and Feb 11, 2025 — classified as 11 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Deformation4
- Material Puncture/Hole3
- Leak/Splash2
- Burst Container or Vessel1
- Inflation Problem1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 11, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AUROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER WAS ABOUT TO BE USED DURING A RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY (RIRS). DURING PREPARATION, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE BALLOON WAS TORN AS SOON AS THEY REMOVED THE PACKING. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21356529 ↗MalfunctionSep 4, 2024Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PREPARATION A UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE WAS FOUND BENT AT THE END OF THE BALLOON WHERE IT WAS ROLLED UP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE WITH NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20141069 ↗MalfunctionMay 3, 2024Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE WAS USED DURING A RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY (RIRS) PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE CONTRAST MEDIA WAS LEAKED FROM THE BALLOON CATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE WITH NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED A PINHOLE IN THE CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19243678 ↗MalfunctionMar 11, 2024Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE WAS USED DURING A URETEROSCOPY (URS) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER SHOWS BENDING DAMAGE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18882208 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2024Inflation Problem; Material Puncture/Hole; Inflation Problem; Material Puncture/Hole
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE WAS TO BE USED DURING A URETEROSCOPY (URS) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. DURING PREPARATION, THE BALLOON EXPANSION DID NOT WORK. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD. THIS EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED A REPORTABLE EVENT BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION FINDING OF BALLOON PINHOLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18741415 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE WAS TO BE USED DURING A URETEROSCOPY (URS) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. DURING PREPARATION, THE CATHETER WAS BENT IN THE MIDDLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD. THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17599279 ↗MalfunctionDec 19, 2022Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON CATHETER WAS USED IN THE RIGHT URETER DURING AN URETEROSCOPY (URS) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON WAS LEAKING CONTRAST. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON CATHETER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16003424 ↗MalfunctionFeb 24, 2021Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE WAS USED IN THE RIGHT URETER DURING A URETEROSCOPY (URS) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE CONTRAST WAS INJECTED TO THE BALLOON IT WAS NOTICED THAT THERE WAS NO PRESSURE. THE C-ARM WAS CHECKED AND NOTED TO HAVE A LEAK FROM A SMALL HOLE THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11372349 ↗MalfunctionAug 12, 2020Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON CATHETER WAS USED IN THE RIGHT URETER DURING A UTEROSCOPY (URS) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON HAD A FINE HOLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON CATHETER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10395229 ↗MalfunctionJul 23, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA URETERAL DILATATION BALLOON WAS USED IN THE RIGHT URETER DURING A URETERAL BALLOON DILATION PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON BURST AS SOON AS THE PRESSURE WAS GRADUALLY INCREASED TO EXPAND THE BALLOON.THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA URETERAL DILATATION BALLOON DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8815831 ↗MalfunctionJan 15, 2019Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON DEVICE WAS USED IN THE LEFT URETER DURING A URETERAL STRICTURE BALLOON DILATION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING PREPARATION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS KINKED. ADDITIONALLY, IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT CATHETER WOULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE GUIDEWIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8246924 ↗
Other DILATOR, URETHRAL devices
- Bard® Urologist's Tray 123400C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, URETHRAL1 recall8 reports
- UroMax Ultra Kit M0062251210Boston Scientific Corporation · DILATOR, URETHRAL1 recall6 reports
- UroMax Ultra Kit M0062251220Boston Scientific Corporation · DILATOR, URETHRAL1 recall5 reports
- UroMax Ultra Kit M0062251370Boston Scientific Corporation · DILATOR, URETHRAL1 recall4 reports
- UroMax Ultra Kit M0062251200Boston Scientific Corporation · DILATOR, URETHRAL1 recall3 reports
- UroMax Ultra Kit M0062251290Boston Scientific Corporation · DILATOR, URETHRAL1 recall2 reports
- UroMax Ultra Kit M0062251310Boston Scientific Corporation · DILATOR, URETHRAL1 recall2 reports
- UroMax Ultra Kit M0062251240Boston Scientific Corporation · DILATOR, URETHRAL1 recall1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page