Skip to content

UroMax Ultra M0062251150Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of UroMax Ultra (11)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729341239), received between Mar 21, 2019 and Mar 21, 2019 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Puncture/Hole” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Puncture/Hole1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 21, 2019Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON WAS USED IN THE URETER DURING A BALLOON DILATION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON HAD A HOLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON . THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. INVESTIGATION RESULTS REVEALED THAT THE BALLOON FOUND A PINHOLE; THEREFORE, THIS IS NOW AN MDR REPORTABLE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8441237 ↗

Other DILATOR, URETHRAL devices

All DILATOR, URETHRAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page