Instinct G57302Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Fusion Omni Pre-Loaded With Acrobat 2 Wire Guide · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002573021), received between Oct 10, 2022 and Dec 10, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Peeled/Delaminated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Peeled/Delaminated2
- Material Separation1
- Sharp Edges1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 10, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK FUSION® PRE-LOADED WITH ACROBAT 2 WIRE GUIDE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ERCP WE [PHYSICIAN AND TEAM] HAD AN ISSUE WITH THE GUIDEWIRE WHEN EXCHANGING THE SPHINCTEROTOME AND WE HAD TO CUT THE GUIDEWIRE TO GET THE SPHINCTEROTOME OFF. IT APPEARS THE GUIDEWIRE COATING PEALED OFF. IMAGES OF THE DEVICE SHOWING WIRE GUIDE COATING DAMAGE WERE PROVIDED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20896273 ↗MalfunctionJan 16, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK FUSION® PRE-LOADED WITH ACROBAT 2 WIRE GUIDE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SPHINCTEROTOME WAS RETRIEVED AND THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO REINSERT INTO THE WIRE LOCK. THE DISLOCATED CUTTING WIRE REFUSED TO BE PUSHED THROUGH THE WIRE LOCK. AFTER CHECKING THE TIP IT WAS REALIZED THE A PART OF THE CUTTING WIRE WAS DISLOCATED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16174282 ↗MalfunctionOct 10, 2022Peeled/Delaminated; Sharp Edges; Peeled/Delaminated; Sharp Edges
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK FUSION® PRE-LOADED WITH ACROBAT 2 WIRE GUIDE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON OPENING DEVICE, NO ABNORMALITIES WERE EVIDENT. THE FORMING WIRE WAS REMOVED WITH NO ISSUES. THE TOME WAS FLUSHED AGAIN WITH SALINE BUT THE WIRE WAS COMPLETELY STUCK. THE TOME WAS REMOVED AND UPON INSPECTION IT WAS NOTED THAT THE TOME TIP [WIRE GUIDE TIP] WAS NOT INTACT [COATING DAMAGE] AND THAT THE WIRE WAS GETTING STUCK AT THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE CUTTING WIRE PORTION OF THE TOME - IT APPEARS THE CATHETER IS SMALLER IN THAT SECTION THAN THE REST OF THE TOME [MANUFACTURED TO BE TAPERED]. THE ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE SCOPE AND DISCARDED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH COMPETITOR PRODUCT. PER OUR EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE ON 10/28/2022: THERE IS NO COATING DAMAGE OF THE WIRE GUIDE. INSTEAD, THERE IS DAMAGE AT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE SPHINCTEROTOME CATHETER. [SUBJECT OF REPORT] A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVE
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15572981 ↗
Other Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices
- THUNDERBEAT 5 mm, 35 cm, Front-actuated Grip TB-0535FCOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall2 deaths404 reports
- SONICBEAT 5 mm, 35 cm, Front-actuated Grip SB-0535FCOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)379 reports
- Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-611LOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 death357 reports
- Autotome™ RX 44 M00545170Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall262 reports
- TRUEtome 44 M00584170Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)237 reports
- Dreamtome™ RX 44 M00584040Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall165 reports
- Dreamtome™ RX 44 M00584050Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)1 recall127 reports
- Single Use 3-Lumen Sphincterotome V KD-V411M-0725Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories)160 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page