Skip to content

Instinct G57302Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Fusion Omni Pre-Loaded With Acrobat 2 Wire Guide · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002573021), received between Oct 10, 2022 and Dec 10, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Peeled/Delaminated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Peeled/Delaminated2
  • Material Separation1
  • Sharp Edges1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 10, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK FUSION® PRE-LOADED WITH ACROBAT 2 WIRE GUIDE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ERCP WE [PHYSICIAN AND TEAM] HAD AN ISSUE WITH THE GUIDEWIRE WHEN EXCHANGING THE SPHINCTEROTOME AND WE HAD TO CUT THE GUIDEWIRE TO GET THE SPHINCTEROTOME OFF. IT APPEARS THE GUIDEWIRE COATING PEALED OFF. IMAGES OF THE DEVICE SHOWING WIRE GUIDE COATING DAMAGE WERE PROVIDED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20896273 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 16, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation

    DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK FUSION® PRE-LOADED WITH ACROBAT 2 WIRE GUIDE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SPHINCTEROTOME WAS RETRIEVED AND THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO REINSERT INTO THE WIRE LOCK. THE DISLOCATED CUTTING WIRE REFUSED TO BE PUSHED THROUGH THE WIRE LOCK. AFTER CHECKING THE TIP IT WAS REALIZED THE A PART OF THE CUTTING WIRE WAS DISLOCATED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16174282 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 10, 2022Peeled/Delaminated; Sharp Edges; Peeled/Delaminated; Sharp Edges

    DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK FUSION® PRE-LOADED WITH ACROBAT 2 WIRE GUIDE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON OPENING DEVICE, NO ABNORMALITIES WERE EVIDENT. THE FORMING WIRE WAS REMOVED WITH NO ISSUES. THE TOME WAS FLUSHED AGAIN WITH SALINE BUT THE WIRE WAS COMPLETELY STUCK. THE TOME WAS REMOVED AND UPON INSPECTION IT WAS NOTED THAT THE TOME TIP [WIRE GUIDE TIP] WAS NOT INTACT [COATING DAMAGE] AND THAT THE WIRE WAS GETTING STUCK AT THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE CUTTING WIRE PORTION OF THE TOME - IT APPEARS THE CATHETER IS SMALLER IN THAT SECTION THAN THE REST OF THE TOME [MANUFACTURED TO BE TAPERED]. THE ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE SCOPE AND DISCARDED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH COMPETITOR PRODUCT. PER OUR EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE ON 10/28/2022: THERE IS NO COATING DAMAGE OF THE WIRE GUIDE. INSTEAD, THERE IS DAMAGE AT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE SPHINCTEROTOME CATHETER. [SUBJECT OF REPORT] A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15572981 ↗

Other Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices

All Unit, electrosurgical, endoscopic (with or without accessories) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page