Snowden-Pencer 88-8333Recalls & reported problems
Steris Corporation · Snowden-Pencer SLIDELOCK ATRAUMATIC GRASPER SINGLE-PIECE, DOUBLE ACTION 37CM, 5MM, 22MM JAW INSUL SHAFT, ROT, RATCHETED · Class 2
All models of Snowden-Pencer (62)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10885403154461), received between Jul 23, 2021 and Jul 23, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Problem1
Patient problems
- Perforation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 23, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
ATRAUMATIC SLIDE LOCK HANDLE IS VERY DIFFICULT TO UNLOCK ONCE IN THE LOCKED POSITION AND IT IS CAUSING THE JAW TO PULL AND IN SOME CASES TEAR TISSUE. THERE HAVE BEEN INSTANCES OF TORN TISSUE ON A PATIENT DUE TO THE JAW PULLING TOO HARD WHEN THE HANDLE IS UNABLE TO UNLOCK. THIS CUSTOMER RECENTLY REPLACED THEIR SLIDE LOCKS #88-8333 ACROSS THE BOARD AND THE SURGEONS STARTED NOTICING THE DIFFERENCE ALMOST IMMEDIATELY WITH THE NEW SLIDE-LOCKS. THEY HAVE HAD SURGEON COMPLAINTS FROM 3 OF THE 5 USING THIS INSTRUMENT. 19JUL2021 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: WHAT WAS THE PROCEDURE THAT WAS BEING PERFORMED? MULTIPLE PROCEDURES. WAS THERE A MEDICAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED DUE TO THE TORN TISSUE? THERE WAS NOT. WHAT WAS THE PATIENT¿S OUTCOME? HAVE NOT HAD A POOR OUTCOME. WAS THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED AS PLANNED? YES. CAN YOU PLEASE SEND ALL PARTS OF THE INSTRUMENT FOR EVALUATION? YES, IF WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE A BACKUP PLAN. DO YOU HAVE THE LOT NUMBER? NO. DO YOU HAVE PHOTOS OF THE REPORTED ISSUE ON THE INSTRUMENT? NO, SENT 3 GRASPERS WITH SALES REP FOR EVALUATION. WAS THE PRODUCT RECEIVED IN THIS CONDITION? NOT SURE. HOW MANY INSTRUMENTS HAVE THIS REPORTED ISSUE OF DIFFICULT TO UNLOCK ONCE IN THE LOC
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 12219616 ↗
Other LAPAROSCOPE, GYNECOLOGIC (AND ACCESSORIES) devices
- Olympus WA50042AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)1 recall6,135 reports
- Olympus WA50052AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)2,249 reports
- ENDOEYE FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LTF-S190-5Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · LAPAROSCOPE, GYNECOLOGIC (AND ACCESSORIES)1 recall1,279 reports
- Olympus WA50040AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)1 recall954 reports
- Olympus WA50050AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)895 reports
- ENDOEYE FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LTF-S190-5Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)624 reports
- Epix Laparoscopic Scissors CB030Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)239 reports
- HD EndoEYE LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LTF TYPE VHOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · LAPAROSCOPE, GYNECOLOGIC (AND ACCESSORIES)168 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page