Skip to content

Olympus WA22305DRecalls & reported problems

OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Class 2

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 14042761051672), received between Sep 14, 2018 and Nov 18, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 8, 2023Open, Classified

    Additional Caution statements in IFU: (1) Due to complaints where the loop wire at the distal end of the HF resection electrode broke after getting in contact with metal objects, such as other endoscopic equipment, implants or stents. As a result, fragments can fall inside the patient and must be retrieved. (2) The second Caution refers to the risk of sparkover when getting in contact with metal parts as this can cause uncontrolled heating of the HF-resection electrode and may result in damage and breakage to the HF-resection electrode tip

    Z-2413-2023 · Root cause: Process design · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Device Damaged Prior to Use1
  • Fracture1
  • Material Fragmentation1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 18, 2025Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use

    IT WAS REPORTED THE ELECTRODE WAS BENT, UPON RECEIPT OF THE RESECTION ELECTRODE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23586883 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 14, 2018Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem

    OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE (TURP) PROCEDURE, THE LOOP WIRE AT THE DISTAL END OF THE HF RESECTION ELECTRODE BROKE OFF AND FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT. HOWEVER, NO FRAGMENT REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT SINCE IT WAS REPORTEDLY RETRIEVED. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH THE SAME SET OF EQUIPMENT AND THERE WAS NO REPORT ABOUT AN ADVERSE EVENT OR PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7876061 ↗

Other Electrode, Electrosurgical, Active, Urological devices

All Electrode, Electrosurgical, Active, Urological devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.