SJM Masters Series HPRecalls & reported problems across all models
St. Jude Medical, Inc. · 9 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 24
- Deaths reported
- 3
- Injuries reported
- 13
- Recalls
- 0
We found 9 models of SJM Masters Series HP by St. Jude Medical, Inc. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 24 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jul 4, 2018 and Oct 26, 2023 — classified as 3 deaths, 13 injuries, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported SJM Masters Series HP problems
Device problems
- Fracture6
- Incomplete Coaptation4
- Material Separation4
- Obstruction of Flow3
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Biocompatibility1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
- Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure2
- Insufficient Information2
- Aortic Valve Stenosis1
- Cardiac Arrest1
- Complete Heart Block1
SJM Masters Series HP models
9 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- SJM™ Masters Series HP 19AHPJ-505HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL3 deaths5 reports
- SJM™ Masters Series HP 17AHPJ-505HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL3 reports
- SJM™ Masters Series HP 21AHPJ-505HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL3 reports
- SJM™ Masters Series HP 23AHPJ-505HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL3 reports
- SJM™ Masters Series HP 25AHPJ-505HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL3 reports
- SJM™ Masters Series HP 17MHPJ-505HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL3 reports
- SJM™ Masters Series HP 21MHPJ-505HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL2 reports
- SJM™ Masters Series HP AEHPJ-505HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL1 report
- SJM™ Masters Series HP AFHPJ-505HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL1 report
Recent SJM Masters Series HP adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
DeathOct 26, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, A 21MM EPIC PLUS SUPRA WAS IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO A PARAVALVULAR LEAK OF 8 MMHG AND AVERAGE GRADIENT OF 35 MMHG. A 19MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS IMPLANTED AS A REPLACEMENT. POST IMPLANT, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PASSED AWAY. THE CAUSE AND DATE OF THE DEATH IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18013991 ↗MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Fracture; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Fracture; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT (B)(6) 2023, A 17MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR PROCEDURE. THE VALVE HAD BEEN SIZED USING A 905 MECHINICAL HEART VALVE SIZER SET. IT WAS NOTED DURING PROCEDURE THAT THE LEAFLET OF THE VALVE FRACTURED INTO TWO PIECES WHEN ROTATING THE VALVE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE VALVE WAS UNABLE TO BE ROTATED WHEN THE LEAFLET FRACTURED. ALL THE PIECES WERE SUCCESSFULLY RECOVERED/REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. NO OTHER INSTRUMENTS ENCOUNTERED THE VALVE AT THE TIME OF FRACTURE. THE HOLDER HANDLE HAD BEEN FULLY INSERTED INTO THE ORIFICE AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE. THE VALVE WAS IN A CLOSED POSITION WHEN ATTEMPTING TO ROTATE IT AND THE LEAFLET FRACTURED. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO REPLACE THE 17MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WITH A 19MM SJM MASTERS SERIES VALVE EXPANDED CUFF TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS NOT TAKEN OFF BYPASS AND PLACED BACK ON BYPASS DUE TO THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT REMAINED HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN PROCEDURE AND NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE AT THE TIME OF REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16981415 ↗MalfunctionMay 2, 2023Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, A 25MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR IMPLANTATION. AFTER THE DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED, IT WAS NOTED THAT NEITHER OF THE LEAFLETS WOULD OPEN. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THE VALVE WOULD NOT ROTATE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM PATIENT ANATOMY AND REPLACED WITH A NON-ABBOTT DEVICE. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE FINE AND RECOVERING. THE PATIENT REMAINED HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16854270 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2023Device Stenosis; Device Stenosis
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2021, A 21MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS IMPLANTED INTO A PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT HAD A HIGH GRADIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16525536 ↗DeathDec 14, 2022Incomplete Coaptation; Incomplete Coaptation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022, A 19MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR IMPLANTATION. PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE. WHILE IMPLANTING THE VALVE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE LEAFLETS DID NOT OPEN AND CLOSE PROPERLY. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW 19MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS A PROLONGED PROCEDURE TIME TO PLACE THE NEW VALVE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD REMAINED HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE. AFTER THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS PUT ONTO INTROPICAL SUPPORT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PASSED AWAY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE DUE TO CHONDROGENIC SHOCK AND HEART FAILURE. DUE TO CHANGING THE VALVE THE PATIENTS PROCEDURE TIME WAS EXTENDED, POSSIBLY CONTRIBUTING TO PATIENT FATALITY.
Patient problems: Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure
MAUDE report 15978878 ↗MalfunctionOct 29, 2022Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022, A 21MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS IMPLANTED INTO A PATIENT. AFTER THE VALVE WAS IMPLANTED, THE LEAFLET ON THE VALVE BROKE. THE VALVE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH 21MM EPIC SUPRA VALVE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15694781 ↗InjuryOct 26, 2022Fracture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Fracture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022, A 25MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE VALVE WAS ATTEMPTED TO INSERT IN THE AORTIC POSITION THROUGH A WOVEN DACRON'S TUBE. IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO PUSH ON THE VALVE WITH THE SUPPORT HANDLE BUT THIS WAS UNSUCCESSFUL DUE TO FRICTION AND THE SUPPORT HANDLE WAS REMOVED. IT WAS THEN ATTEMPTED TO USE DISSECTION FORCEPS TO PUSH ON THE CUFF TO POSITION THE DEVICE IN THE PATIENT'S ANNULUS BUT THIS WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. A LEAFLET WAS FRACTURED AND THE OTHER LEAFLET DISLODGED AND TRAVELED TO THE PATIENT'S LEFT VENTRICLE. THE DISLODGED LEAFLET AND FRACTURED LEAFLET WERE BOTH REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AS ONE SINGLE PIECE THE A 25MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS NOT IN THE FULLY CLOSED POSITION WHEN BEING ROTATED, BUT NO RESISTANCE WAS NOTED WHEN ROTATING THE VALVE. THE HOLDER HANDLE HAD BEEN FULLY INSERTED INTO THE VALVE'S ORIFICE AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO REMOVE THE 25MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE AND REPLACE IT WITH A 25MM SJM MASTERS SERIES MECHANICAL HEART VALVE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE REPLACEMENT VALVE WAS IMPLANTED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATIENT
Patient problems: Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure
MAUDE report 15676132 ↗MalfunctionOct 18, 2022Incomplete Coaptation; Incomplete Coaptation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022, A 17MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR IMPLANT IN AN INTRA-ANNULAR AORTIC PLACEMENT VIA AORTOTOMY. ONCE IMPLANTED THE VALVE WAS IMPLANTED, THE PHYSICIAN TOOK A PLASTIC TIP TO CHECK LEAFLET MOBILITY. IT WAS SHOWN USING TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAM (TEE) THAT THE LEAFLETS WERE NOT PROPERLY COAPTING DUE TO AN OBSTRUCTION OF THE LEAFLETS. THE VALVE WAS NOT ROTATED. THE VALVE WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER 17MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE. ANOTHER TEE WAS PERFORMED, AND THE REPLACEMENT VALVE WAS SHOWN TO BE FUNCTIONING NORMALLY. THE AORTOTOMY WAS CLOSED AN THE PROCEDURE CONCLUDED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. SIGNIFICANT PAST MEDICAL HISTORY INCLUDES A SMALL, HEAVILY CALCIFIED AORTIC ROOT AND TUBULAR AORTA. THE PATIENT REMAINED HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN PROCEDURE AND NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN DISCHARGED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15620964 ↗DeathSep 23, 2022Incomplete Coaptation; Incomplete Coaptation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022, A 19MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR IMPLANT. IT WAS NOTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE THE LEAFLETS OF THE VALVE WERE NOT COAPTING PROPERLY. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO EXPLANT THE 19MM MASTERS VALVE AND REPLACE IT WITH A 17MM REGENT VALVE. DUE TO AN UNKNOWN REASON THE PATIENT WAS PRONOUNCED DECEASED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15474111 ↗InjuryJan 27, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2021, A 17MM MASTERS MECHANICAL HEART VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR IMPLANT. DURING PROCEDURE, AS THE VALVE WAS BEING ROTATED, ONE OF THE LEAFLETS CAME OUT FROM THE HINGE MECHANISM. THE VALVE WAS EXCHANGED FOR A NEW NON-ABBOTT VALVE, WHICH WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13366623 ↗MalfunctionMay 7, 2021Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
ON (B)(6) 2021, A 19MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR IMPLANT. DURING PROCEDURE IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LEAFLET BROKE WHILE TRYING TO ROTATE THE VALVE. ALL THE PIECES WERE RECOVERED AND A NEW 19MM SJM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. THERE WAS A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN PROCEDURE HOWEVER, THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11789645 ↗MalfunctionOct 21, 2020Fracture; Fracture
ON (B)(6) 2020, A 21MM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR IMPLANT IN THE PATIENT. ONE OF THE LEAFLETS BROKE INTO 3 PIECES AFTER SUTURING THE VALVE IN PLACE. ALL PIECES OF THE BROKEN LEAFLET AND THE VALVE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND EXCHANGED FOR A 19MM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE. THE PHYSICIAN DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE THIS EVENT TO OVERSIZING, THERE WAS NO OTHER SET AND VALVE AVAILABLE AND TIME WAS RUNNING OUT. THE 19MM MASTERS SERIES HEMODYNAMIC PLUS VALVE WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. THERE WAS A 20-30 MINUTE CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE, BUT THE PATIENT REMAINED HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE AND EXPERIENCED NO SERIOUS INJURIES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10712439 ↗InjuryOct 5, 2020Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow
REFERENCE MANUFACTURER REPORT NUMBER: 2648612-2020-00101. ON (B)(6) 2016, A 27MM MECHANICAL MITRAL VALVE AND A 21MM MECHANICAL AORTIC VALVE WAS IMPLANTED TO REPLACE AN UNKNOWN TISSUE VALVE THAT WAS IMPLANTED IN 2011. THE PATIENT HAS A HISTORY OF ENDOCARDITIS, SYSTEMIC SEPTIC EMBOLI, CARDIOMYOPATHY, HYPERTENSION, SMOKING, PULMONARY HYPERTENSION, BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE AND MODERATE ENLARGEMENT OF ASCENDING AORTA. ON (B)(6) 2020, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT MAY HAVE ENDOCARDITIS AND THAT THERE IS A PLANNED INTERVENTION TO REPLACE THE AORTIC VALVE DUE TO STENOSIS. THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE MITRAL VALVE WILL BE REPLACED AS WELL.
Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Endocarditis
MAUDE report 10631745 ↗InjuryJul 29, 2020Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility
RELATED REFERENCE MANUFACTURING REPORT NUMBER: 3007113487-2020-00018. ON (B)(6) 2017, A 15MM MASTERS MITRAL VALVE WAS IMPLANTED. ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR PLANNED MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DUE TO WORSENING MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS AND PULMONARY HYPERTENSION. ON (B)(6) 2020, THE MITRAL VALVE WAS EXPLANTED AND A NEW 17MM MASTERS MITRAL VALVE WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED FIRST DEGREE HEART BLOCK, COMPLETE HEART BLOCK, AND JUNCTIONAL RHYTHM. THEREFORE, ON (B)(6) 2020, AN EPICARDIAL PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE RECOVERING. CLINICAL STUDY PATIENT ID: (B)(6).
Patient problems: Complete Heart Block
MAUDE report 10339057 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2020Material Separation; Material Integrity Problem; Material Separation; Material Integrity Problem
ON (B)(6) 2020, A 17MM MASTERS MECHANICAL VALVE WAS SELECTED FOR IMPLANT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY REPOSITIONING THE DEVICE AFTER IT WAS POSITIONED, CAUSING DISLODGEMENT OF ONE OF THE LEAFLETS. A REPLACEMENT 15MM MASTERS MECHANICAL VALVE WAS IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT DID NOT SUFFER ANY ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10162642 ↗
Other St. Jude Medical, Inc. products
- Tendril15 models · 49,498 reports
- Octrode10 models · 36,740 reports
- Proclaim12 models · 35,038 reports · 17 recalls
- Durata28 models · 19,805 reports
- Assurity MRI2 models · 17,838 reports · 1 recall
- Gallant8 models · 12,885 reports · 5 recalls
- Quartet10 models · 11,001 reports
- MitraClip19 models · 9,056 reports · 2 recalls
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page