Skip to content

AGENT™ H7493960830200Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter · Class 3

All models of AGENT (23)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00191506014858), received between Mar 25, 2025 and Mar 25, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Failure to Advance1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 25, 2025Break; Entrapment of Device; Failure to Advance; Break; Entrapment of Device; Failure to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. A 2.00 X 30MM AGENT BALLOON WAS SELECTED FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION PROCEDURE. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE SEVERELY CALCIFIED DISTAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (LAD). LESION WAS TREATED WITH 1.25 ROTATIONAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM AND BALLOONING WAS PERFORMED WHICH ADEQUATELY PREPPED VESSEL. UPON ATTEMPTED DELIVERY OF THE AGENT BALLOON TO THE DISTAL LAD, BALLOON COULD NOT BE DELIVERED TO THE TREATMENT AREA. THERE WAS ALSO LESION IN MID LAD, BALLOON WAS ELECTED TO BE INFLATED, FOLLOWING INFLATION, BALLOON WAS STUCK ON NON-BSC GUIDEWIRE. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO RETRIEVE, THE BALLOON WAS PULLED BACK INTO THE GUIDE AT WHICH POINT IT BECAME MORE STUCK ON THE WIRE AND THE SHAFT OF THE AGENT BALLOON BROKE. THE WIRE WAS THEN REMOVED WHICH SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED AGENT BALLOON. ANOTHER A 2.00 X 30MM AGENT BALLOON WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE DELIVERED TO THE DISTAL LAD AND A DIFFERENT NON-BSC GUIDEWIRE WAS USED. THE AGENT BALLOON WAS DELIVERED OVER THIS GUIDEWIRE BUT FAILED TO REACH THE DISTAL LAD, THE BALLOON WAS THEN USED TO TREAT ANOTHER MORE PROXIMAL LESION. UPON REMOVAL, THE AGENT BALLOON WAS STUCK ON THE GUIDEWIRE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPL

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21687127 ↗

Other Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter devices

All Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page