AGENTRecalls & reported problems across all models
Boston Scientific Corporation · 23 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 86
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 13
- Recalls
- 0
We found 23 models of AGENT by Boston Scientific Corporation in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 86 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Aug 15, 2024 and Sep 30, 2026 — classified as 13 injuries, 73 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (39 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported AGENT problems
Device problems
- Break39
- Material Rupture17
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem15
- Difficult to Advance10
- Failure to Advance10
- Nonstandard Device9
- Entrapment of Device8
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress6
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions75
- Myocardial Infarction6
- Vascular Dissection4
- Cardiac Enzyme Elevation3
- Chest Pain2
- Discomfort1
- Dyspnea1
- Ischemia1
AGENT models
23 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- AGENT™ H7493960830250Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter10 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960820300Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter8 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960830300Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter8 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960820250Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter6 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960830400Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter6 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960815300Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter5 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960820400Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter5 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960830350Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter5 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960812300Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter4 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960815250Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter4 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960820350Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter4 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960815350Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter3 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960815400Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter3 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960820220Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter3 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960812250Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter2 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960812350Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter2 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960830270Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter2 reports
- AGENT™ H7493960812400Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter1 report
- AGENT™ H7493960815200Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter1 report
- AGENT™ H7493960815270Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter1 report
- AGENT™ H7493960820200Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter1 report
- AGENT™ H7493960830200Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter1 report
- AGENT™ H7493960830220Drug-eluting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter1 report
Recent AGENT adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 50948445 ↗InjurySep 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that a grade C dissection occurred. The 2.75 mm x 20 mm target lesion located at the 2nd diagonal branch was pretreated with two devices with the largest balloon size of 3 mm x 15 mm. The non-complaint balloon had a maximum inflation pressure of 8 and two balloon inflations. Final pretreatment stenosis was 40% with TIMI flow 3. IVUS with Opticross 6 catheter was used to confirmed pretreatment results. The target lesion was then successfully treated with a 3.0 mm x 30 mm Agent DCB device. The device achieved an inflation pressure of 6 with an inflation time of 80. However, a grade C dissection was discovered, and an interventional procedure was completed to place a non-Boston Scientific drug eluting stent. The patient was discharged.
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 50944990 ↗MalfunctionSep 26, 2026Break; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50909432 ↗MalfunctionSep 9, 2026Material Rupture
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50697637 ↗MalfunctionSep 8, 2026Contamination; Packaging Problem
It was reported that device contamination occurred.Upon arrival to the facility, a 2.00 x 15mm Agent DCB was discovered to have damage to the outer box and the inner packaging was ripped open, compromising the sterility of the device. The shipping box was also noted to be damaged as well. There was no patient involved.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50674697 ↗InjurySep 4, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that a NSTEMI requiring intervention occurred. In early (b)(6) 2026, the 2.75 mm x 25 mm target lesion located at the right posterior descending vessel was pretreated with a semi-compliant and non-compliant balloon with the largest balloon being 2.5 mm x 25 mm. Maximum inflation pressure was 16 with a total of 2 balloon inflations. Pretreatment resulted in 20% stenosis and TIMI flow 3. The target lesion was then successfully treated with a 3.0 mm x 30 mm AGENT DCB balloon, maximum inflation pressure was 8 with a total of 1 balloon inflation. Prior to the target lesion treatment, the non-target lesion located at the mid left anterior descending artery was also successfully treated with a 3.5 mm x 16 mm drug eluting stent and 3.75 mm x 12 mm balloon angioplasty catheter. Patient discharged on the same day of the procedure.Shortly after the procedure in (b)(6) 2026, the patient experienced dyspnea and had a NSTEMI that required an in-patient hospitalization, stent placement, target vessel revascularization and medication administration (Heparin). Patient discharged.It was later reported: That shortly after the procedure in (b)(6) 2026, the patient also experienced ches
Patient problems: Chest Pain; Dyspnea; Myocardial Infarction; Restenosis; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 50619349 ↗InjurySep 1, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that patient complications occurred.The 10 mm x 2.50 mm target lesion was located in the mid left anterior descending artery (LAD). The patient was on a prior regimen of Aspirin (>= 72 hours) and antiplatelet other than Aspirin (>= 72 hours) at the time of index procedure. A loading dose of 325 mg of aspirin and 600 mg of clopidogrel were given prior to the procedure. The target lesion was pre-treated with four devices including a 2.50 mm x 12 mm non-compliant balloon angioplasty catheter resulting in 30% residual stenosis and TIMI flow 3. The target lesion was then successfully treated with a 2.50 mm x 30 mm Agent DCB resulting in 0% residual stenosis and TIMI flow of 3. Post-procedure, elevated cardiac enzymes were detected, and the patient was diagnosed with myocardial infarction. The patient was discharged from the hospital with the continuation of aspirin, and clopidogrel medication was started.
Patient problems: Cardiac Enzyme Elevation; Myocardial Infarction
MAUDE report 50550390 ↗InjurySep 1, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that elevated cardiac enzymes and myocardial infarction occurred. The patient was on a prior regimen of antiplatelet other than Aspirin (>= 72 hours). At the time of the procedure, Heparin or other antithrombotic medication and a loading dose of 325 mg of Aspirin and 300 mg of Clopidogrel were given. The 3.0 mm x 33 mm target lesion located at the distal circumflex (CX) vessel in the main branch was pretreated with 3.0 mm x 15 mm non-compliant balloon angioplasty catheter resulting in 0% residual stenosis and TIMI flow 3. The lesion was then successfully treated with 3.0 mm x 33 mm drug eluting stent (non-Boston Scientific device) achieving 0% residual stenosis with TIMI flow 3. The other 2.5 mm x 15 mm target lesion located at the 2nd obtuse marginal vessel in the side branch was pretreated with a 2.5 mm x 15 mm non-compliant balloon angioplasty catheter resulting in 0% residual stenosis and TIMI flow 3. The lesion was then successfully treated with the 2.5 mm x 20 mm AGENT DCB achieving 0% residual stenosis with TIMI flow 3. One day post procedure, the 18-24-hour post procedure lab draw demonstrated elevated levels of Troponin T HS and Troponin-I HS which met the
Patient problems: Cardiac Enzyme Elevation; Myocardial Infarction
MAUDE report 50550330 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2026Break; Difficult to Advance
It was reported that a shaft break occurred.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in a moderately tortuous and severely calcified distal right coronary artery (RCA). A 4.00 mm x 15.00 mm Agent drug coated balloon (DCB) was selected for treatment. During the procedure, while the physician was advancing the balloon, it snapped at the mid shaft. The device was removed as a single unit, and the procedure was completed using a different device.It was further reported that the user encounter resistance while advancing the device. It was fractured on the balloon shaft. And there was no patient complications.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50334625 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2026Break; Failure to Advance
It was reported that a shaft break within a patient occurred. A 3.00 mm x 12mm AGENT US MR was selected for a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to evaluate the target lesion. During the procedure, the device could not advance in the lesion and the shaft subsequently broke. The procedure was completed as planned and the device was successfully removed in one piece from the patient. No patient complications reported.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50334624 ↗InjuryAug 12, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 50229874 ↗InjuryJul 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that patient complications occurred.A loading dose of 324 mg of aspirin and 600 mg of clopidogrel were given prior to the procedure. The 8.00 mm x 2.50 mm target lesion was located in the first diagonal branch of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). The target lesion was pre-treated with a 2.50 mm x 15 mm non-compliant balloon angioplasty catheter resulting in 10% residual stenosis and TIMI flow 3. The target lesion was then successfully treated with a 2.50 mm x 15 mm Agent DCB resulting in 0% residual stenosis and TIMI flow of 3. An additional 28 mm x 3.00 mm target lesion located from the proximal to mid LAD was pre-treated with a 2.50 x 15 mm semi-compliant balloon angioplasty catheter resulting in 30% residual stenosis and TIMI flow of 3. The lesion was further treated with a 3.00 mm x 33 mm non-Boston Scientific drug eluting stent resulting in 0% residual stenosis and TIMI flow of 3. A non-target lesion located in the mid right coronary artery (RCA) was successfully treated prior to the treatment of target lesion using a 4.00 mm x 28 mm drug eluting stent and a 4.00 mm x 15 mm balloon angioplasty catheter. Post-procedure, elevated cardiac enzymes were det
Patient problems: Cardiac Enzyme Elevation; Myocardial Infarction
MAUDE report 50073432 ↗MalfunctionJul 29, 2026Break
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50071001 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2026Nonstandard Device; Material Rupture
It was reported that a balloon rupture occurred.A 4.00 mm x 30.00 mm Agent drug-coated balloon (DCB) was selected for an in-stent restenosis (ISR) treatment. The balloon ruptured immediately upon launch without inflation. The guide catheter was also positioned within the vessel at the time of the event. The device was removed from patient; the procedure was successfully completed with an alternative device. There was no patient complication reported.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25774276 ↗InjuryJul 8, 2026Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON FAILED TO EXIT THE GUIDE CATHETER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. AN AGENT (DCB) WAS SELECTED FOR A PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN THE EXAMINATION OF THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE LESION WAS PRETREATED WITH BALLOONS AND THEN A SYNERGY XD STENT WAS IMPLANTED. THE AGENT DCB WAS ATTEMPTED BUT WOULD BARLEY COME OUT OF THE GUIDE CATHETER AND A GUIDEZILLA WAS NEEDED TO REMOVE IT. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25749333 ↗
Other Boston Scientific Corporation products
- INGEVITY MRI7 models · 16,601 reports
- INGEVITY+3 models · 16,054 reports
- EMBLEM S-ICD4 models · 13,295 reports · 1 recall
- WATCHMAN25 models · 8,024 reports · 6 recalls
- AMS 800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter31 models · 7,515 reports · 2 recalls
- ENDOTAK RELIANCE SG9 models · 6,540 reports · 2 recalls
- RELIANCE 4-FRONT11 models · 5,739 reports
- FINELINE II EZ Sterox6 models · 5,633 reports
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page