Renuvion APYX-15-TPRecalls & reported problems
Apyx Medical Corporation · RENUVION® APR HANDPIECE (15 cm) TWIN PORT · Class 2
All models of Renuvion (4)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 11
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00607151050153), received between Nov 20, 2020 and Apr 25, 2025 — classified as 11 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Use of Device Problem5
- Patient Device Interaction Problem4
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method3
- Insufficient Device Problem Information3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings1
Patient problems
- Burn(s)4
- Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn3
- Scar Tissue3
- Adhesion(s)1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Hyperpigmentation1
- Hypopigmentation1
- Inflammation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 25, 2025Break; Break
THE PATIENT RECEIVED A FULL THICKNESS BURN ON THE MEDIAL, DISTAL THIGH AND A SEGMENT OF THE HANDPIECE IS BELIEVED TO HAVE BECOME DISLODGED AND WAS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT DURING A PROCEDURE IN WHICH RENUVION WAS USED AS PART OF THE OVERALL SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 21913515 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH SCAR CONTRACTURES AFTER A PROCEDURE IN WHICH RENUVION WAS USED AS PART OF THE OVERALL SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Scar Tissue; Skin Discoloration
MAUDE report 21396961 ↗InjuryAug 6, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A BURN ON THEIR NECK / CHIN / SUBMENTAL AREA 2 WEEKS AFTER A PROCEDURE IN WHICH RENUVION WAS USED AS PART OF THE OVERALL SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Burn(s)
MAUDE report 19920015 ↗InjuryMay 20, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
THE PATIENT SUSTAINED A BURN ON THEIR ARM AFTER A SUBDERMAL COAGULATION PROCEDURE IN WHICH RENUVION WAS USED AS PART OF THE OVERALL SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Burn(s); Scar Tissue
MAUDE report 19353719 ↗InjuryMay 10, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE PATIENT SUSTAINED A DEEP PARTIAL-THICKNESS (SECOND-DEGREE) BURN WHICH PROGRESSED INTO A FULL-THICKNESS (THIRD-DEGREE) BURN ON THEIR NECK AFTER A PROCEDURE IN WHICH RENUVION WAS USED AS PART OF THE OVERALL SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 19292107 ↗InjuryMar 22, 2024Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
THE PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING HYPER/HYPOPIGMENTATION OF THE NECK APPROXIMATELY SIX MONTHS POST-OPERATIVELY AFTER MICROAIRE POWER ASSISTED LIPOSUCTION (PAL) WAS PERFORMED AND IN WHICH DERMAL RESURFACING WAS PERFORMED WITH A RENUVION HANDPIECE AS PART OF THE OVERALL SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Hyperpigmentation; Hypopigmentation
MAUDE report 18963279 ↗InjurySep 24, 2022Use of Device Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Use of Device Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
PATIENT UNDERWENT VASER LIPOSUCTION FOLLOWED BY SUBDERMAL COAGULATION WITH RENUVION TO THE SUBMENTAL AREA. ONE PASS WITH RENUVION WAS PERFORMED AT GENERATOR SETTINGS OF 80% POWER AND 1.5 LITERS OF FLOW. SPEED, SPACING, INFILTRATION SOLUTION AND AMOUNT, TREATMENT PLANE DEPTHS, AND ASPIRATION AMOUNT WAS REQUESTED BUT NOTED AS UNKNOWN BY THE SURGEON'S OFFICE. PATIENT WORE A GARMENT POST PROCEDURE AND FOLLOWED AFTER CARE INSTRUCTIONS PER HER SURGEON'S PROTOCOL. HOWEVER, THREE DAYS POST PROCEDURE, A BURN TO THE TREATED AREA WAS NOTICED. THE DEGREE OF BURN WAS NOT CONFIRMED BY THE SURGEON. MULTIPLE STEROID INJECTIONS OF KENALOG WERE ADMINISTERED BY THE SURGEON TO THE AFFECTED AREA ON (B)(6) 2022. ADDITIONALLY, MICRO-NEEDLING WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022 IN EFFORT TO TREAT THE BURN. ALTHOUGH THE SURGEON NOTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS HEALING, THE PATIENT HAS A VISIBLE SCAR POST PROCEDURE AND TREATMENTS AS A RESULT OF THE BURN. THE CAUSE OF THE BURN IS DUE TO END HITS. THE END HITS MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THE APYX MEDICAL DEVICE OR THE VASER DEVICE OR A COMBINATION OF BOTH DURING THE PROCEDURE. END HITS ARE NOT A RECOMMENDED TECHNIQUE PER THE APYX MEDICAL TECHNIQUE CONSIDERATIONS WHICH ARE DIS
Patient problems: Burn(s); Scar Tissue
MAUDE report 15476014 ↗InjuryFeb 16, 2022Use of Device Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Use of Device Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SURGEON THAT A (B)(6) YEAR OLD FEMALE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH UNILATERAL MARGINAL MANDIBULAR NERVE INJURY, TWO WEEKS POST LIPOSUCTION AND RENUVION TREATMENT TO THE SUBMENTAL AREA. UNDERMINED WAS PERFORMED IN THE SUBCUTANEOUS PLANE OF THE NECK THROUGH A SUBMENTAL CREASE SMALL INCISION WITH A 3.7MM SINGLE HOLE CANNULA. ABOUT 400 CC OF WETTING SOLUTION WAS INSTILLED AND A TOTAL OF 6 PASSES WERE PERFORMED. POST PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS PLACED IN A COMPRESSION NECK WRAP. THE SURGEON'S MAIN CONCERN WAS TO BE REASSURED THIS WOULD NOT BE PERMANENT. THIS WAS THE SURGEON'S FIRST USE WITH RENUVION. THE PATIENT WILL CONSULT WITH A PLASTIC SURGEON FOR A POSSIBLE INJECTION OF A TOXIN TO THE UNAFFECTED SIDE FOR SYMMETRY UNTIL THE NERVE INJURY IMPROVES. CURRENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS PRESCRIBED AN ORAL STEROID IN EFFORT TO SPEED THE HEALING TIME OF THE NERVE INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 2/14/2022 PROVIDING THE DEVICE INFORMATION, APYX-15-TP, LOT#0000013937. THE SURGEON USED A 3.7 MM SINGLE HOLE CANNULA FOR UNDERMINING, INFILTRATED WITH 400CC OF FLUID. THE LOCATION OF INSERTION SITES WERE AT THE SUBCUTANEOUS PLANE OF THE NECK, THROUGH A SUBMENTAL CREASE INCISIO
Patient problems: Nerve Damage
MAUDE report 13545465 ↗InjuryNov 29, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO APYX MEDICAL CORPORATION THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SUPERFICIAL VERSA PROCEDURE FOLLOWED BY SUBDERMAL COAGULATION WITH RENUVION TO THE NECK AND JOWL ON (B)(6) 2021. FOUR PASSES WERE PERFORMED AT 60% POWER AND 1.5L FLOW. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INFLAMMATION AND FEVER. THE PATIENT WAS STARTED ON ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY OF KEFLEX 500 MG TO TREAT THE FEVER AND SWELLING. HOWEVER, THE INFLAMMATION HAS NOT RESOLVED. BASED ON THE REPORTED INFORMATION, THERE WAS NO ALLEGED MALFUNCTION OF THE DEVICE. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT DID REQUIRE MEDICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Inflammation; Skin Infection; Skin Inflammation/ Irritation
MAUDE report 12882001 ↗InjuryAug 11, 2021Use of Device Problem; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Use of Device Problem; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SUBDERMAL COAGULATION TRIAL CASE OF UPPER ABDOMEN ONLY. THE PATIENT'S OUTCOME RESULTED IN UPPER ABDOMINAL ADHESIONS DUE TO INAPPROPRIATE USE BY THE SURGEON. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PERFORMANCE ISSUES WITH THE HANDPIECE OR DELIVERY GENERATOR.
Patient problems: Adhesion(s); Wrinkling
MAUDE report 12306286 ↗InjuryNov 20, 2020Use of Device Problem; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Use of Device Problem; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
PATIENT PRESENTED ONE DAY POST-OPERATIVE WITH A THIRD DEGREE BURN. THE INVESTIGATION CONCLUDED THAT THE ISSUE IS ASSOCIATED WITH POOR SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND POOR PATIENT SELECTION. THERE IS NO REPORTED MALFUNCTION OF THE DEVICE.
Patient problems: Burn(s); Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 10875134 ↗
Other Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page