Epix ® Laparoscopic Dissector CY010Recalls & reported problems
Applied Medical Resources Corporation · 5mm x 35cm Disposable Dissector · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00607915126964), received between Feb 15, 2017 and May 12, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Activation Failure1
- Failure To Adhere Or Bond1
- Fracture1
- Incomplete or Inadequate Connection1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 12, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
PROCEDURE PERFORMED: TOTAL LAPARASCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY. EVENT DESCRIPTION: DURING A TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY AT THE END WHILE FINISHING, THE SURGEON WAS USING DISSECTORS AND WHEN THEY PULLED THEM OUT OF THE TROCAR, HALF OF THE JAW WAS MISSING. IMMEDIATELY X-RAYED PATIENT DURING THE SURGERY AND FOUND THE PIECE BUT WAS UNABLE TO RETRIEVE. PIECE WAS LEFT INSIDE OF PATIENT. INTERVENTION: SURGERY WAS ALREADY OVER WHEN MALFUNCTION WAS NOTICED. PATIENT STATUS: PATIENT X-RAYED, PIECE FOUND BUT NOT ABLE TO BE RETRIEVED.PATIENT X-RAYED, PIECE FOUND BUT NOT ABLE TO BE RETRIEVED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25156084 ↗MalfunctionJan 7, 2026Fracture
PROCEDURE PERFORMED: LAP TAPP HERNIA. EVENT DESCRIPTION: THE ACTION BEING PERFORMED WHEN THE EVENT OCCURRED WAS TRYING TO DISSECT INGUINAL REGION. WHILE DISSECTION THE INGUINAL, THE HANDLE GOT DETACHED FROM THE INSTRUMENT. LUCKILY THE SURGEON REMOVED FROM THE 5MM TROCAR HOLDING THE SHAFT END. THERE WAS NO CLINICAL IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. INTERVENTION: HE REPLACED WITH OTHER DISSECTOR FROM THE STORES. PATIENT STATUS: NOTHING ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23999160 ↗MalfunctionJul 12, 2021Activation Failure; Incomplete or Inadequate Connection; Activation Failure; Incomplete or Inadequate Connection
PROCEDURE PERFORMED: UNKNOWN. EVENT DESCRIPTION: THE ACCT MGR WAS NOT PRESENT FOR THE CASE. THE CAUTERY FUNCTION DID NOT WORK FROM THE BEGINNING. IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT MONOPOLAR CORD WAS USED. A NEW DEVICE WAS OPENED AND USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THE CORD WAS ABLE TO BE ATTACHED TO THE DEVICE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE CABLE WAS REPLACED WITH THE ALTERNATE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS AVAILABLE. THE DEVICE IS AVAILABLE TO BE RETURNED. INTERVENTION: A NEW DEVICE WAS OPENED AND USE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. PATIENT STATUS: NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12155615 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
PROCEDURE PERFORMED: LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. DURING THE CASE, ONE OF THE JAWS BROKE OFF THE DISSECTOR AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT. IT IS UNKNOWN WHEN DURING THE CASE THIS OCCURRED. THE DISSECTOR WAS USED TO DISSECT THE CYSTIC DUCT. NO DAMAGE WAS NOTED ON THE DISSECTOR PRIOR TO THE JAW BREAKING. THE PIECE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW DISSECTOR. NO PATIENT INJURY. NO PHOTOS ARE AVAILABLE. PRODUCT IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON (B)(6) 2021 FROM [NAME]: THE EXACT DATE WAS NOT AVAILABLE. I WAS TOLD IT OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY 2 WEEKS PRIOR TO THE DATE I FILED THE CER. THE DISSECTOR WAS BEING USED TO DISSECT THE CYSTIC DUCT. INTERVENTION: USED NEW RETRIEVAL BAG TO COMPLETE CASE. PATIENT STATUS: NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11389154 ↗MalfunctionFeb 15, 2017Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Failure To Adhere Or Bond
UNKNOWN PROCEDURE - "DISSECTOR SCISSORED AT TIP." TYPE OF INTERVENTION - NA. PATIENT STATUS - "RELEASED."
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6333831 ↗
Other Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page