Aquamantys™ 23-113-1 (UDI 00763000280895)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · BIPOLAR SEALER 23-113-1 AQM 2.3 · Class 2
All models of Aquamantys (12)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000280895), received between May 3, 2021 and Oct 17, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fire” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fire4
- Excess Flow or Over-Infusion3
- Break2
- Activation Problem1
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions9
- Burn(s)1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE HANDPIECE TUBING WAS FOUND TO HAVE A MATERIAL PUNCTURE OR HOLE, RESULTING IN THE DEVICE DRIPPING ONTO THE FLOOR. THE IRRIGATION FROM THE BAG HAD BEEN USED TO IRRIGATE AN INTEGRA PATCH FOR IMPLANTATION. THERE WAS NO IMPACT ON PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23322358 ↗MalfunctionSep 4, 2025Activation Problem; Activation Problem
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A HANDPIECE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HANDPIECE BUTTON WAS NOT WORKING. A NEW HANDPIECE WAS BROUGHT IN, AND IT FUNCTIONED AS DESIGNED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INCIDENT HAPPENED AT THE START OF THE CASE. PATIENT WAS PRESENT AND THE CASE WAS DELAYED SLIGHTLY TO REPLACE WITH NEW HANDPIECE AND IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF EVENT OCCURRED WAS A SPINE CASE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22963556 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2025Excess Flow or Over-Infusion; Excess Flow or Over-Infusion
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A GENERATOR. IT WAS REPORTED THAT SALINE LEAKED NONSTOP AT HIGH LEVELS DESPITE SELECTING DIFFERENT FLOW SETTINGS. THIS HAPPENED WITH 2 HANDPIECES. THE HANDPIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE ROOM BY THE STAFF. THERE WAS NO DELAY AND NO IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21418585 ↗MalfunctionFeb 3, 2025Excess Flow or Over-Infusion; Excess Flow or Over-Infusion
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A GENERATOR. IT WAS REPORTED THAT SALINE LEAKED NONSTOP AT HIGH LEVELS DESPITE SELECTING DIFFERENT FLOW SETTINGS. THIS HAPPENED WITH 2 HANDPIECES. THE HANDPIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE ROOM BY THE STAFF. THERE WAS NO DELAY AND NO IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21298145 ↗MalfunctionOct 18, 2024Fire; Fire
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED DURING THE EVENT WAS SPINE CASE AND THERE WAS A MINIMAL DELAY IN SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20479533 ↗InjuryJul 5, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM AN UNKNOWN SOURCE REGARDING A GENERATOR AND HANDPIECE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A HANDPIECE WAS USED FOR A PARTIAL LIVER RESECTION AND THE SITE BELIEVED THAT IT MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH A BURN ON THE PATIENT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BOX FOR THE HANDPIECE WAS NOT SAVED. THERE WAS NO DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Burn(s)
MAUDE report 17260667 ↗MalfunctionMar 31, 2023Fire; Fire
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A HANDPIECE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN USING THE HANDPIECE IT SPARKED. THIS SPARK CAUSED THE SITE TO OPEN ANOTHER HANDPIECE TO CONTINUE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16656187 ↗MalfunctionAug 4, 2022Break; Excess Flow or Over-Infusion; Break; Excess Flow or Over-Infusion
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A HANDPIECE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BEFORE THE SURGICAL OPERATION, AFTER OPENING, IT WAS CONNECTED TO THE GENERATOR FOR PREPARATION. WHEN PRIMING IT, THE SALINE LEAKED AND BREAKAGE WERE DETECTED. BECAUSE IT WAS UNUSED, THE TAPE WAS APPLIED AND FIRST AID WAS PERFORMED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15167268 ↗MalfunctionMay 3, 2021Fire; Fire
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURE REPRESENTATIVE (REP) REGARDING TWO GENERATOR AND TWO HANDPIECES. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SACROILIAC AND THORACOLUMBAR PROCEDURE, THE HANDPIECES WAS EXCESSIVELY SPARKING. THEY TRIED SWITCHING THE HAND PIECES AND THEY WERE STILL GETTING EXCESSIVE SPARKING. THEY DECIDED TO SWITCH GENERATORS AND STILL NO RESOLUTION. THEY ULTIMATELY DECIDED TO NOT USE THE GENERATOR. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO PATIENT OUTCOME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11760561 ↗MalfunctionMay 3, 2021Fire; Fire
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURE REPRESENTATIVE (REP) REGARDING TWO GENERATOR AND TWO HANDPIECES. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SACROILIAC AND THORACOLUMBAR PROCEDURE, THE HANDPIECES WAS EXCESSIVELY SPARKING. THEY TRIED SWITCHING THE HAND PIECES AND THEY WERE STILL GETTING EXCESSIVE SPARKING. THEY DECIDED TO SWITCH GENERATORS AND STILL NO RESOLUTION. THEY ULTIMATELY DECIDED TO NOT USE THE GENERATOR. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO PATIENT OUTCOME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11760543 ↗
Other Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page