PhotonBlade PB1Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · The PhotonBlade is an RF device coupled with illumination that is indicated for cutting and coagulation of soft tissue during surgical procedures. It is intended to be used with a variety of standard commercially available electrosurgical units. · Class 2
All models of PhotonBlade (3)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 18
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 18 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816728020158), received between Jun 6, 2017 and Oct 18, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 16 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Flaked” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Flaked5
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect3
- Fracture2
- Break1
- Device Remains Activated1
- Out-Of-Box Failure1
- Sparking1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
- Superficial (First Degree) Burn5
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 18 most recent of 18 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 18, 2024Flaked; Flaked
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE COATING ON THE TIP OF THE PHOTONBLADE FELL INSIDE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A DELAY; NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20480498 ↗MalfunctionMay 1, 2024Flaked; Flaked
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE COATING ON THE ELECTRODE TIP WAS FLAKING OFF. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A DELAY; NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19220899 ↗MalfunctionDec 6, 2022Flaked; Flaked
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MASTECTOMY, THE COATING ON THE PHOTON BLADE TIP FLAKED OFF WITHIN TEN MINUTES OF USE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A DELAY; NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15926954 ↗MalfunctionOct 19, 2022Flaked; Flaked
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE PROTECTIVE COATING ON THE PHOTON BLADE STARTED CHIPPING OFF. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WAS DELAY OF A FEW MINUTES TO REMOVE THE CHIPS. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15631383 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2022Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE PHOTON BLADE BROKE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO DELAYS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15362326 ↗MalfunctionMar 28, 2022Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY BLUE RING AROUND THE LIGHT FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO DELAYS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13929376 ↗MalfunctionOct 12, 2021Flaked; Flaked
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE WHILE THE BREAST WAS OPEN, THE COATING MATERIAL FROM THE PHOTON BLADE FLAKED OFF. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO DELAYS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12614995 ↗MalfunctionJul 4, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
APPROXIMATELY (B)(6) 2018, DURING A PACEMAKER CHANGE OUT THE INSULATION OF A LEAD WAS ACCIDENTALLY DAMAGED. A REPAIR KIT WAS USED TO FIX THE LEAD INTRAOPERATIVELY. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER INCIDENT AND NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THIS INCIDENT WAS REPORTED TO INVUITY ON (B)(4) 2018.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7661760 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2018Device Remains Activated; Device Remains Activated
DURING A CASE THE PHOTONBLADE REMAINED ACTIVE AFTER THE BUTTON WAS RELEASED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICE WAS UNPLUGGED AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING A DIFFERENT DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7520882 ↗MalfunctionFeb 8, 2018Break; Break
TOWARD THE END OF A BI-LATERAL NIPPLE SPARING MASTECTOMY, THE COLLAR THAT LOCKS/UNLOCKS THE TELESCOPING SHAFT BROKE. TWO MAIN HALVES WERE RETRIEVED IMMEDIATELY AND A THIRD SMALLER PIECE COULD NOT BE ACCOUNTED FOR. THE SURGEON DID AN EXAMINATION OF THE SURGICAL CAVITY AND DID NOT SEE A THIRD PIECE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7252965 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2018Out-Of-Box Failure; Out-Of-Box Failure
WHEN THE PHOTON BLADE WAS INITIALLY CONNECTED TO THE GENERATOR, A SOLID AUDIBLE TONE WAS EMITTED BY THE ESU. IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED TWO VERY MINOR BURNS. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING A SECOND DEVICE.
Patient problems: Superficial (First Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 7245971 ↗MalfunctionJan 5, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO AN INVUITY REPRESENTATIVE ON (B)(4) 2017, THAT THE INSULATION OF A LEAD WAS ACCIDENTALLY DAMAGED DURING A BATTERY REPLACEMENT OF AN ICD. A SUTURE SLEEVE WAS APPLIED OVER THE DAMAGED AREA OF THE INSULATION. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER INCIDENT AND NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7170453 ↗MalfunctionJan 5, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO AN INVUITY REPRESENTATIVE ON (B)(6) 2017 THAT DURING A BATTERY REPLACEMENT OF AN ICD THE INSULATION OF A LEAD WAS ACCIDENTALLY MELTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7170446 ↗InjuryJun 29, 2017Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect; Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect
DURING A BREAST BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN NOTED A SMALL AMOUNT OF ENERGY DISCHARGE COMING FROM THE SHAFT OF THE DEVICE. THIS RESULTED IN A SMALL BURN (<1 MM) AT THE OPENING OF THE INCISION. THE DOCTOR REMOVED THE AFFECTED TISSUE AND CLOSED THE INCISION.
Patient problems: Superficial (First Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 6679528 ↗MalfunctionJun 29, 2017Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect; Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect
DURING A LUMPECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN NOTED A BURN NEAR THE PERI-AREIOLAR INCISION. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED.
Patient problems: Superficial (First Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 6679521 ↗MalfunctionJun 29, 2017Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect; Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect
DURING A LUMPECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN NOTED A SUPERFICIAL BURN ON THE SKIN. THERE WAS NO FOLLOW-UP TREATMENT REPORTED.
Patient problems: Superficial (First Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 6679511 ↗MalfunctionJun 29, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
DURING AN ICD GEN CHANGE PROCEDURE, THE INSULATION OF A LEAD WAS ACCIDENTALLY CUT. THE LEAD WAS REPAIRED AND ITS FUNCTION WAS TESTED; THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6679508 ↗InjuryJun 6, 2017Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Sparking; Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Sparking
DURING A LUMPECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THAT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE TELESCOPING WAVEGUIDE FELT HOT. THE PHYSICIAN EXAMINED THE INCISION AREA AND NOTICED A BURN NEAR THE PERI-AREOLA REGION THAT REQUIRED A SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Superficial (First Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 6614502 ↗
Other Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page