Skip to content

COBLATION EICA8872-01 (UDI 00817470003727)Recalls & reported problems

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROCISE XP WAND · Class 2

All models of Coblation (62)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
18
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
10
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 18 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00817470003727), received between Sep 28, 2017 and Apr 19, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
  • Break4
  • Activation Failure2
  • Material Separation2
  • Output below Specifications2
  • Suction Failure2
  • Degraded1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding5
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
  • Burn(s)3
  • Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 18 most recent of 18 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2026Break; Degraded

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TONSILLECTOMY, ONE PROCISE XP ELECTRODES BURNED OFF OR BROKE; THERE WAS ONLY ONE HORIZONTAL METAL LINE NOTED AND TWO METAL HORIZONTAL LINE WAS MISSING. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING THE SAME DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24921331 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLEEDING 24 HOURS AFTER THE SURGERY WITH THE PROCISE XP COBLATOR WAND AND HAD TO RETURN TO SURGERY. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 24722552 ↗
  • InjuryMar 19, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLEEDING 24 HOURS AFTER THE SURGERY WITH THE PROCISE XP COBLATOR WAND AND HAD TO RETURN TO SURGERY. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 24644287 ↗
  • InjuryMar 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AFTER AN ENT PROCEDURE, THE PROCISE XP COBLATOR II WAND DID NOT PERFORM AS EXPECTED DUE THAT PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLEEDING AT SOME POINT DURING THE FIRST 24 HOURS. THE PATIENT HAD TO RETURN TO THE ER FOR TREATMENT AND WAS GIVEN MEDICATION TO CONTROL THE BLEEDING. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 21668861 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 16, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TONSILLECTOMY AND ADENOIDECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE PRONGS OF THE PROCISE COBLATOR II WAND TIP BROKE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CASE. NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY WAS REPORTED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS FINISHED WITH A SMITH AND NEPHEW BACK UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17558725 ↗
  • InjuryMay 31, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TONSILLECTOMY, THE SURGEON NOTICED THAT THE PROCISE XP COBLATOR II WAND WAS NO LONGER WORKING, THUS, THE SURGEON INSPECTED THE TIP WITH A MAGNIFYING SURGICAL LOPS AND STATED THAT THE MIDDLE COIL/WIRE WAS MISSING. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PIECE WAS LEFT INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY WAS REPORTED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS FINISHED WITH A SMITH AND NEPHEW BACK UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 17031654 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 16, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER A SURGERY WITH A PROCISE WAND, A 6 YEAR OLD CHILD PASSED AWAY DUE TO POST OP BLEED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 16387406 ↗
  • InjuryJan 19, 2023Activation Failure; Suction Failure; Activation Failure; Suction Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TONSIL AND ADENOID PROCEDURE THE PROCISE XP II DID NOT BURN WELL AND THERE WERE LOTS OF BLEEDING, AND IT ALSO KEPT GETTING CLOGGED. THE BLEEDING WAS STOPPED BY THE DOCTOR WHEN A NEW WAND WAS USED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY USING A SMITH AND NEPHEW BACK UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 16206873 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 2, 2023Activation Failure; Suction Failure; Activation Failure; Suction Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TONSILLECTOMY & ADENOIDECTOMY PROCEDURE, TWO (2) PROCISE XP COBLATOR WANDS LOST THE ABILITY TO COBLATE AND SUCTION. THE SUCTION WAS CHECKED AND IT WAS ON FULL SUCTION. THE HANDPIECES TIP WERE CLEANED AND FLUSHED SEVERAL TIMES. THE SETTINGS STARTED AT PRESET # 7 AND 4, WERE INCREASED TO 9 AND 5 THROUGHOUT CASE IN ATTEMPT TO GET THE HANDPIECES TO WORK. THE ISSUES RESULTED IN AN EXTENDED LENGTH OF THE CASE AND BLEEDING FOR THE PATIENT THAT WAS CONTROLLED USING A SUCTION BOVIE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SURGICAL DELAY GREATER THAT 30 MINUTES USING A BACK-UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16082720 ↗
  • InjuryOct 31, 2022Overheating of Device; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Overheating of Device; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A LITTLE LIP BURN WHEN USING THE PROCISE COBLATOR II. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS A BACK-UP DEVICE AVAILABLE OR IF THERE WAS A DELAY.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 15698461 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2022Output below Specifications; Output below Specifications

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENT PROCEDURE USING A PROCISE XP WAND, THE COAGULATION FUNCTION WAS NOT WORKING EFFECTIVELY AND PRODUCING THE COAG RESULT THAT IS NORMALLY PRODUCED. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THERE WAS A VISIBLE BURN ON THE LOWER RIGHT SIDE OF THE LIP. THE WOUND WAS NOT STAGED. IN RECOVERY, THE TISSUE WAS INTACT, GREY-WHITE COLOR, NO DRAINAGE. THE BURN WAS TREATED WITH VASELINE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NON-SIGNIFICANT SURGICAL DELAY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED.

    Patient problems: Burn(s); Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn

    MAUDE report 15676297 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2022Output below Specifications; Output below Specifications

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENT PROCEDURE USING A PROCISE XP WAND, THE COAGULATION FUNCTION WAS NOT WORKING EFFECTIVELY AND PRODUCING THE COAG RESULT THAT IS NORMALLY PRODUCED. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THERE WAS A VISIBLE BURN ON THE LOWER RIGHT SIDE OF THE LIP. THE WOUND WAS NOT STAGED. IN RECOVERY, THE TISSUE WAS INTACT, GREY-WHITE COLOR, NO DRAINAGE. THE BURN WAS TREATED WITH VASELINE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NON-SIGNIFICANT SURGICAL DELAY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED.

    Patient problems: Burn(s); Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn

    MAUDE report 15676251 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TONSILLECTOMY A COBLATOR II WAS NOT WORKING, THE THREE WIRES WERE NOT INTACT. SURGERY WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, WITH A BACK-UP DEVICE. THE WIRES DID NOT BREAK OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT, THEREFORE THERE WAS NO NEED TO BE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT THE ELECTRODE WAS COMPLETELY DETACHED WHICH CAUSED THAT THE WAND COULD NOT BE ABLE TO GENERATE PLASMA AND COAGULATION DUE TO DETACHED ELECTRODE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15513054 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A TONSILLECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE ELECTRODES OF THE "PROCISE XP WAND" BURNT OUT FAST. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT DELAY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURIES OR OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION HAVE CONCLUDED THAT VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE DEVICE SHOWED DETACHMENT OF ONE OF THE ELECTRODES AND THIS IS A REPORTABLE EVENT. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 10738561 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 20, 2018Device Emits Odor; Smoking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MACHINE "SMELT FUNNY" IN SURGERY AND THE WAND WAS SMOKING/STEAMING ABNORMALLY. ALL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE CASE IS BEING RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A COMPETITIVE DEVICE (BOVIE-CAUTERY). NO PATIENT INJURY OR OTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7353612 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 5, 2018Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT LINGUAL TONSILLECTOMY WHEN THE WIRE ON THE WAND BROKE. PATIENT WAS CLOSELY MONITORED AND PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. THIS CAME FROM VOLUNTARY MEDWATCH DIRECTLY FROM FDA MW5073732. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7170170 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 5, 2018Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INGUINAL AND PALATINE TONSILECTOMY AND AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE IT WAS NOTICED THAT ONE OF THE THREE WIRES OF THE WAND WAS BROKEN. PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL OVERNIGHT TO BE CLOSELY MONITORED FOR ANY POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS. HE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCHARGED. BASED ON THE CURRENT AVAILABLE INFORMATION NO SERIOUS INJURY COULD BE CONFIRMED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7168503 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2017Sparking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCISE COBLATOR WAS SPARKING. A BACK-UP DEVICE WAS AVAILABLE AND NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6901100 ↗

Other Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories devices

All Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page