Skip to content

Coblation EICA8875-01Recalls & reported problems

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROCISE EZ VIEW WAND · Class 2

All models of Coblation (62)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
15
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00817470004335), received between Feb 20, 2019 and Apr 20, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Arcing” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
  • Arcing3
  • Sparking3
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1
  • Overheating of Device1
  • Peeled/Delaminated1
  • Smoking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
  • Blood Loss3
  • Apnea2
  • Electric Shock1
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1

Recent adverse event reports

The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2026Peeled/Delaminated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A TONSILLECTOMY AND ADENOIDECTOMY, A PROCISE EZ VIEW WAND HAD AN IRREGULARITY ON THE SHEATH, IT WAS EXPOSED. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, AFTER A DELAY OF LESS THAN 5 MINUTES, USING AN EQUIVALENT S+N BACK-UP. AFTER THE PROCEDURE, A SIMILAR APPEARANCE WAS NOTED ON A SECOND WAND. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24924094 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 2, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SET UP, THE PROCISE EZ VIEW COBLATOR WAND MALFUNCTIONED. THE BLACK PLASTIC SHEATH OF THE WAND WAS SLICED. THERE WAS A BACKUP DEVICE AVAILABLE. NO DELAY WAS REPORTED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20824810 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 20, 2023Overheating of Device; Overheating of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WHOLE PROCISE COBLATOR WAND WAS GETTING VERY HOT AND THE TIP WAS SMOKING. NO CASE REPORTED; THEREFORE, NO PATIENT WAS INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16572791 ↗
  • InjuryMay 4, 2022Unintended Electrical Shock; Unintended Electrical Shock

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TONSILLECTOMY AND ADENOIDECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON FELT A SHOCK FROM THE PROCISE WAND WHEN HE PLACED HIS FOOT ON THE COBLATOR PEDAL. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT SURGICAL DELAY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Electric Shock

    MAUDE report 14274438 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON LITERATURE REVIEW ¿COBLATION INTRACAPSULAR TONSILLECTOMY (TONSILLOTOMY) IN CHILDREN: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 500 CONSECUTIVE CASES WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP¿; AFTER SURGERY WITH A PROCISE EZ VIEW COBLATION WAND, TWO PATIENTS HAD A SMALL SECONDARY BLEED AT APPROXIMATELY ONE WEEK AFTER SURGERY. THE BLEED SETTLED SPONTANEOUSLY AT HOME; THE PATIENTS RETURNED FOR OBSERVATION AND RE-ADMISSION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 12222712 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON LITERATURE REVIEW ¿COBLATION INTRACAPSULAR TONSILLECTOMY (TONSILLOTOMY) IN CHILDREN: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 500 CONSECUTIVE CASES WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP¿; AFTER SURGERY WITH A PROCISE EZ VIEW COBLATION WAND 12 PATIENTS HAD RECURRENT NASAL OBSTRUCTION, OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA & SLEEP DISORDERED BREATHING. THE COMPLICATION WAS TREATED WITH REVISION ADENOIDECTOMY SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Apnea

    MAUDE report 12222711 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON LITERATURE REVIEW ¿COBLATION INTRACAPSULAR TONSILLECTOMY (TONSILLOTOMY) IN CHILDREN: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 500 CONSECUTIVE CASES WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP¿; AFTER SURGERY WITH A PROCISE EZ VIEW COBLATION WAND 12 PATIENTS HAD RECURRENT OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA AND TONSILLITIS SYMPTOMS. THE PATIENTS WERE TREATED WITH REVISION TONSIL SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Apnea

    MAUDE report 12222710 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 5, 2021No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENDO SINUS SURGERY, THE PROCISE WANDS WERE DEFECTIVE. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE. A SIGNIFICANT DELAY GREATER THAN 30 MIN WAS REPORTED. NO PATIENT INJURY OR OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11116225 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 16, 2019Arcing; Arcing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY THE DEVICE HAD ELECTRICAL SPARKS. THERE WAS A BACKUP DEVICE AVAILABLE. NO DELAY OR PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8794564 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 15, 2019Sparking; Sparking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY THE WAND STARTED TO SPARK , AS PER REPORTER THE WANT CONTINUED TO SPARK. NO PATIENT INJURIES OR DELAY REPORTED. BACK-UP DEVICE WAS AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8788736 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 11, 2019Arcing; Sparking; Arcing; Sparking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY THE WAND, SPARKED AND CONTINUED TO SPARK. A BACKUP DEVICE WAS AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH NO DELAY OR PATIENT INJURIES.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8780074 ↗
  • InjuryMay 17, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A TONSILLECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A POST-OPERATIVE REBLEED. ALL FURTHER INFORMATION IS STILL UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Blood Loss

    MAUDE report 8620235 ↗
  • InjuryMay 17, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A TONSILLECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A POST-OPERATIVE REBLEED. ALL FURTHER INFORMATION IS STILL UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Blood Loss

    MAUDE report 8620234 ↗
  • InjuryMay 17, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A TONSILLECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A POST-OPERATIVE REBLEED. ALL FURTHER INFORMATION IS STILL UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Blood Loss

    MAUDE report 8620233 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2019Smoking; Arcing; Sparking; Temperature Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TONSILLECTOMY, THE DEVICE BEGAN SMOKING, THE DEVICE WAS REPORTED AS MUCH WARMER THAN NORMAL DURING USE BY THE SURGEON. THERE WERE NO SPARKING OR ARCING DURING THE CASE. A BACKUP DEVICE WAS AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY, DELAY AND PATIENT INJURIES WERE NOT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8353878 ↗

Other ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES devices

All ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page