Skip to content

Xper Flex Cardio Physiomonitoring System Xper FC2010 Rev E EXCHANGERecalls & reported problems

Philips Ds North America LLC · Xper FC2010 Rev E EXCHANGE · Class 2

All models of Xper Flex Cardio Physiomonitoring System (19)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884838093775), received between Sep 7, 2021 and Oct 6, 2022 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings1
  • Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 6, 2022Output Problem

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT DURING A CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY WHILE MONITORING THE HEART RHYTHM OF A PATIENT, A BREAK OCCURRED AND LASTED 5 MINUTES. AFTER CHECKING THE CONNECTIONS TO THE PATIENT AND THE EQUIPMENT, THE ECG SIGNAL ONLY RESUMED AFTER THE BALLOON, WHICH IS USED TO MONITOR THE PATIENT'S VITAL PARAMETERS DURING THE EXAMINATION HAD BEEN SWITCHED OFF AND ON AGAIN.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15550140 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 7, 2021Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED TO PHILIPS THAT, "THE INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE REAL TIME WAVEFORM WAS DISPLAYED CORRECTLY, BUT ITS NUMERICAL VALUES WERE NOT UPDATED. THE MALFUNCTION HAPPENED DURING AN URGENT CATH-LAB PROCEDURE. THE CUSTOMER NOTICED THAT THE INVASIVE PRESSURE WAS DECREASING ON THE DISPLAYED WAVEFORM, BUT THE PRESSURE NUMERICAL VALUES WERE FROZEN. THEY DID A SNAPSHOT AND IN THE SNAPSHOT THE PRESSURE NUMERICAL VALUES WERE CORRECTLY UPDATED AS EXPECTED. THE DEVICE WAS IN CLINICAL USE AT THE TIME THE REPORTED ISSUE WAS DISCOVERED. NO ADVERSE EVENT INVOLVING A PATIENT OR USER WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12436437 ↗

Other Monitor, physiological, patient (without arrhythmia detection or alarms) devices

All Monitor, physiological, patient (without arrhythmia detection or alarms) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page