Olympus WB990207Recalls & reported problems
OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Bipolar applicator CELON ProCurve V · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04042761085014), received between Jul 3, 2018 and Jul 3, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Falling” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Component Falling1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 3, 2018Component Falling; Component Falling
OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT AFTER AN RF VNUS PROCEDURE, THE PROTECTIVE COVERING OF THE DEVICE WAS OBSERVED INSIDE THE PATIENT. AFTER THE PROCEDURE, THE DOCTOR PERFORMED AN ULTRASOUND ON THE PATIENT AND OBSERVED SOMETHING ABNORMAL IN THE PATIENT'S LEG. THE PATIENT WAS RUSHED TO A LOCAL HOSPITAL AND A CT SCAN WAS PERFORMED, HOWEVER, THERE WAS FOREIGN OBJECT FOUND. THE PATIENT WAS THEN BROUGHT BACK TO THE USER FACILITY FROM WHICH THE DOCTOR CONFIRMED THE FOREIGN OBJECT WHICH SLIGHTLY REGRESSED IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT LEG. THE OLYMPUS SALES REPRESENTATIVE ASKED THE DOCTOR IF HE HAD REMOVED THE PROTECTIVE COVERING FROM THE DEVICE WHICH THE DOCTOR CONFIRMED THAT HE DID NOT REMOVE THE PROTECTIVE COVERING PRIOR TO PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS THEN PUT UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA AND A SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. THE PROTECTIVE COVERING WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT¿S LEG SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATIENT RECOVERED AND WAS DISCHARGED ON THE SAME DAY. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE DOING FINE AND IS SCHEDULED FOR A FOLLOW UP AT A LATER DATE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DOCTOR USED A FIRST DEVICE AND THE MACHINE WAS NOT TURNING THE DEVICE ON. A SECOND DEVICE WAS USED AND THE SAME THING OCCURRED. A 3RD KIT WAS US
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 7657990 ↗
Other Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page