NA 8383423Recalls & reported problems
Richard Wolf GmbH · HOOK ELECTRODE MONO Ø 5MM WL 340MM reusable · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04055207015001), received between Apr 8, 2019 and Apr 6, 2023 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Disintegration” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Disintegration2
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Material Fragmentation1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Overheating of Device1
- Peeled/Delaminated1
- Sparking1
Patient problems
- Gastroesophageal Burn2
- Insufficient Information2
- Bowel Burn1
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 6, 2023Material Disintegration; Material Disintegration
THE USER FACILITY HAS INFORMED RICHARD WOLF GMBH AN ISSUE REGARDING A HOOK ELECTRODE MONO Ø 5MM WL 340MM, PART ID: 8383423, BATCH # 1460860. ACCORDING TO THE RECEIVED INFORMATION: "SURGERY: LAPAROSCOPY FOR ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS MONOPOLAR CURRENT AT 30 ALL THE TIME OF THE INTERVENTION - HEMOSTASIS MADE WITH BIPOLAR FORCEPS NOT RESULTING FROM AN EXCESSIVE MONOPOLAR CURRENT. INCIDENT: DURING THE INTERVENTION, OBSERVATION OF A MISSING PART, WHICH PROBABLY FELL INTO THE PATIENT, WITHOUT IT BEING FORMALLY FOUND (PERHAPS SUCKED UP DURING WASHING). NO VISIBLE INJURIES BUT STILL A FEAR THAT THE MISSING PART OF THE HOOK WAS NOT ASPIRATED DURING THE INTERVENTION AND THEREFORE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. NO OTHER CONSEQUENCES."
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16694005 ↗MalfunctionDec 21, 2022Overheating of Device; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Overheating of Device; Insufficient Device Problem Information
RICHARD WOLF GMBH REFERENCE: (B)(4). RICHARD WOLF GMBH IN KNITTLINGEN (MANUFACTURER) WAS INFORMED ABOUT THE FOLLOWING: DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT/CLAIM ACCORDING TO THE CUSTOMER: "DURING SURGERY (LAPAROSCOPY FOR CHOLECYSTECTOMY), MELTING OF THE SHEATH WHICH GENERATED AN ACCIDENTAL BURN ON THE STOMACH." THE INSTRUMENT WAS REPLACED AND THE TREATMENT COULD BE COMPLETED. RWGMBH MDR AWARENESS DATE: 05-DEC-2022.
Patient problems: Gastroesophageal Burn; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16026822 ↗MalfunctionOct 8, 2021Material Disintegration; Material Fragmentation; Material Disintegration; Material Fragmentation
THE PURPOSE OF THIS SUBMISSION IS TO REPORT THE RESULTS OF THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION. SEE MANUFACTURERS NARRATIVE.
Patient problems: Gastroesophageal Burn
MAUDE report 12598689 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2021Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT IS TO REPORT THE RESULTS OF THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION, SEE MANUFACTURERS NARRATIVE AT THE END.
Patient problems: Bowel Burn
MAUDE report 11983731 ↗MalfunctionJul 3, 2019Sparking; Sparking
ON (B)(6) 2019, THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THE FOLLOWING TO RICHARD WOLF MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION (RWMIC): THE CABLE SPARKED DURING THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY. WILL THE DEVICE BE RETURNED? YES. WAS THE DEVICE BEING USED DURING A PROCEDURE WHEN THE ISSUE OCCURRED? YES. SPECIFICALLY, WAS THE DEVICE BEING USED ON A PATIENT WHEN THE ISSUE OCCURRED? NO. WAS THERE ANY INJURY OR ILLNESS TO PATIENT OR OTHER PERSONNEL DUE TO ISSUE? NO. DID THE ISSUE CAUSE A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED THAT PUT THE PATIENT AT RISK? NO. WAS THERE A SIMILAR BACK-UP DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR USE? YES. WAS THE SCHEDULED PROCEDURE COMPLETED? YES. HOW WAS THE PATIENT ANESTHETIZED? GENERAL.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8757859 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
ON (B)(6) 2019 RICHARD WOLF MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION (RWMIC) RECEIVED A REPORT FROM RICHARD WOLF GMBH (GMBH) REPORTING THE FOLLOWING: UNDETECTED LOSS OF THE TIP OF THE MEDICAL DEVICE IN THE ABDOMEN. THE INDICATION OF THE LACK OF THE TIP WAS DETECTED AFTER THE SURGERY DURING THE RE-STERILIZATION OF THE DEVICE. A DIRECT ABDOMINAL X-RAY ALLOWED TO DETECT THE PRESENCE OF THE TIP IN THE ABDOMEN. CURRENTLY PATIENT INJURY IS UNKNOWN, QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN SENT TO THE INITIAL REPORTER.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 8493295 ↗
Other Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page