Skip to content

ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR OER-ProRecalls & reported problems

Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2

3 open recalls name this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Quick summary

This Olympus OER-Pro is an endoscope reprocessor, a machine that cleans and disinfects endoscopes between uses. Many of its 1,157 reports describe breaks, cracks and reprocessing problems, and recent reports describe cleaning fluid not draining and damaged cables. The reports include 25 injuries and no deaths. Three open recalls name this device, covering endoscopes that are no longer compatible, maintenance warnings and labeling changes.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
1,163
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
29
Recalls naming it
3

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1,163 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170258589), received between Oct 3, 2019 and Sep 30, 2026 — classified as 29 injuries, 1,134 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (316 reports).

3 FDA recall records name this device's identifier, 3 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 9 reportsDec 2023: 12 reportsJan 2024: 10 reportsFeb 2024: 10 reportsMar 2024: 10 reportsApr 2024: 7 reportsMay 2024: 14 reportsJun 2024: 11 reportsJul 2024: 5 reportsAug 2024: 8 reportsSep 2024: 12 reportsOct 2024: 11 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 4 reportsJan 2025: 2 reportsFeb 2025: 6 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 3 reportsMay 2025: 6 reportsJun 2025: 2 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 2 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 4 reportsFeb 2026: 15 reportsMar 2026: 3 reportsApr 2026: 5 reportsMay 2026: 4 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 6 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202615
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Feb 12, 2026Open, Classified

    The MAJ-1443 and MAJ-1444 are no longer reprocessing compatible with the OER-Pro and OER-Elite automated endoscope reprocessors.

    Z-1613-2026 · Root cause: Reprocessing Controls · FDA record ↗

  2. Oct 31, 2025Open, Classified

    Inform existing affected device customers about pertinent Warnings/Cautions, existing recommended maintenance schedules and that only properly trained personnel conduct repairs and maintenance.

    Z-0873-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · FDA record ↗

  3. May 26, 2023Open, Classified

    Revised OER-Pro, OER-Elite, OER-Mini endoscope reprocessor labeling- the LF-V and LF-P are no longer compatible endoscopes for reprocessing in the OERs. The addendum highlights the following changes: 1. Removal of LF-V and LF-P as compatible with the OER 2. Change conditions for ETO gas sterilization from 12% EtO to 100% EtO 3. Removing the reusable cleaning brush for the manual cleaning. Single Use brushes remain compatible

    Z-2342-2023 · Root cause: Labeling Change Control · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break316
  • Crack224
  • Device Reprocessing Problem149
  • Connection Problem95
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component36
  • Fluid/Blood Leak25
  • Contamination23
  • Failure to Clean Adequately23

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions825
  • No Patient Involvement284
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient26
  • Viral Infection5
  • Dizziness4
  • Headache4
  • Sepsis4
  • Sexually Transmitted Infection4

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 1,163 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    The customer reported a patient allegation of sepsis following a colonoscopy procedure performed in 2024. The customer inquired whether either of the Olympus endoscope reprocessors had been subject to a recall. No further information was provided. This report is 2 of 2.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 50950162 ↗
  • InjurySep 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    The customer reported a patient allegation of sepsis following a colonoscopy procedure performed in 2024. The customer inquired whether either of the Olympus endoscope reprocessors had been subject to a recall. No further information was provided. This report is 2 of 2.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 50950065 ↗
  • InjurySep 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    The customer reported a patient allegation of sepsis following a colonoscopy procedure performed in 2024. The customer inquired whether either of the Olympus endoscope reprocessors had been subject to a recall. No further information was provided. This report is 1 of 2.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 50950028 ↗
  • InjurySep 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 50949747 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    The customer reported blacks specs present in reprocessing basin after a cycle is completed. This event occurred during reprocessing involving an Olympus Endoscope Reprocessor. There was no reported patient involvement.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50913735 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 8, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    It was reported that the Endoscope Reprocessor had debris in the basin. The issue occurred during reprocessing. There was no patient involvement.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50674484 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 24, 2026Infusion or Flow Problem

    The customer reported that the Endoscope Reprocessor exhibited an issue in which the cleaning fluid was not drained from the basin during reprocessing. There was no patient involvement.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50411801 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 27, 2026Failure to Disinfect

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50008952 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 1, 2026Filling Problem; Decrease in Pressure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING REPROCESSING, THE ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR HAD A PRESSURE DROP ACROSS THE SECOND IN-LINE FILTER FROM 50 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH (PSI) TO 15 PSI. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25354527 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 28, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    IT WAS REPORTED THE TUB FLUID LEVEL SENSOR AND FLOAT SENSOR IN THE ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR WAS DIRTY. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING REPROCESSING. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25320265 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 26, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR EXHIBITED DAMAGE TO THE CABLE END ON THE SIDE CONNECTING TO THE REPROCESSOR, INCLUDING ONE MISSING SCREW PIN. THE ISSUE WAS IDENTIFIED DURING REPROCESSING AND THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25283821 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2026Contamination

    A FIELD SERVICE ENGINEER (FSE) WAS DISPATCHED TO THE USER FACILITY FOR A SEPARATE ISSUE. DURING THE INSPECTION OF THE OER-PRO, THERE WAS DEBRIS FOUND IN THE PRESSURE REGULATOR TUBING. THE FSE REPORTED AFTER THE DEBRIS WAS REMOVED, THE OER-PRO WORKED AS INTENDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25259937 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 19, 2026Device Reprocessing Problem; Activation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR EXHIBITED PROLONGED REPROCESSING CYCLE TIMES. DURING THE CYCLE, THE DEVICE REMAINED AT 17 MINUTES FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD BEFORE COMPLETING THE CYCLE NEAR THE END. THE ISSUE WAS REPORTEDLY OBSERVED FOLLOWING REPLACEMENT OF THE DISINFECTANT ALCOHOL AND DURING THE FIRST CYCLE OF THE DAY. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING REPROCESSING AND THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25220794 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 30, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    IT WAS WAS REPORTED THAT THE ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR EXHIBITED THE DEVICE SENSOR WAS COVERED WITH DEBRIS, A FIELD SERVICE ENGINEER WAS DISPATCHED TO THE CUSTOMER SITE AND THE DEVICE WAS CLEANED AND RECONNECTED THEN TESTED THE DEVICE AND RETURNED TO SERVICE. THE EVENT OCCURRED AT REPROCESSING. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25044933 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 23, 2026Ejection Problem

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24967355 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 23, 2026Device Reprocessing Problem

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE CUSTOMER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24965898 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2026Device Reprocessing Problem

    NO NEW INFORMATION RECEIVED BY THE CUSTOMER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24915615 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2026Failure to Clean Adequately

    IT WAS OBSERVED DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE TUB SENSOR OF THE ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR HAD DEBRIS ON IT. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24909889 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2026Residue After Decontamination

    IT WAS OBSERVED THAT DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE REPROCESSOR HAD DRIED RESIDUE ON THE INSIDE FLOOR OF THE REPROCESSING BASIN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24660892 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 11, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS OBSERVED THAT DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE BROKEN GRAY SCOPE CONNECTOR OF THE REPROCESSOR HAD COME APART. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24571259 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 6, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS OBSERVED DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE REPROCESSOR IS MISSING A TORIC/PACKING JOINT IN THE HOSE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24539290 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 25, 2026Device Reprocessing Problem

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE CUSTOMER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24443657 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 25, 2026Component Missing

    IT WAS OBSERVED THAT DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE REPROCESSOR TANK HAD A MISSING O-RING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24443429 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 24, 2026Degraded

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING DEVICE EVALUATION, THE WATER FILTER OF THE ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR WAS OUT OF DATE RANGE FOR FILTER CHANGE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24431413 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2026Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS OBSERVED THAT DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR EXHIBITED FLOW PROBLEM. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24401832 ↗

Other ACCESSORIES, CLEANING, FOR ENDOSCOPE devices

All ACCESSORIES, CLEANING, FOR ENDOSCOPE devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.