Logi - Laparoscopic Instrument System 120-7500Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05051986000411), received between Jan 4, 2019 and Aug 25, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• OtherAug 25, 2026Material Integrity Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 50434469 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 4, 2019Smoking

  THE SCISSOR WAS BEING USED TO DIATHERMY A SECTION OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND THE CONSULTANT NOTICED SMOKE COMING FROM THE SHAFT OF THE INSTRUMENT AWAY FROM THE SITE OF DIATHERMY WHERE THE UTERUS WAS TOUCHING THE SHAFT. THEREFORE, THE CONSULTANT WAS AWARE THE INSTRUMENT MUST HAVE SHORTED OUT OF VIEW AND CAUSED A BURN TO THE UTERUS WHERE THE SHAFT WAS IN CONTACT WITH IT. ELECTRICAL SHORT CIRCUIT THROUGH THE FAULTY INSULATION CAUSED A SUPERFICIAL BURN TO THE UTERINE SEROSA. THIS WILL HAVE NO CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT BUT IF THE BURN HAD BEEN ON THE BOWEL, BLADDER URETER OR FALLOPIAN TUBES, SERIOUS HARM COULD HAVE RESULTED.

  Patient problems: Burn, Thermal

  MAUDE report 8216986 ↗