LeVeen™ CoAccess™ M001262240Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Needle Electrode System · Class 2
All models of LeVeen CoAccess (3)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729454939), received between Nov 16, 2017 and Mar 3, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Unfold or Unwrap” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Unfold or Unwrap5
- Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Retraction Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient6
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Burn(s)1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 3, 2026Difficult to Insert; Retraction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A BURN. A LEVEEN? COACCESS NEEDLE WAS SELECTED FOR USE. AFTER ABLATION WAS COMPLETED, THERE WAS DIFFICULTY REINSERTING THE NEEDLE INTO ITS SHEATH TO REMOVE IT FROM THE PATIENT. AFTER THE NEEDLE WAS REMOVED, THERE WAS A SECOND OR THIRD DEGREE BURN OBSERVED SURROUNDING THE PUNCTURE SITE. THE PHYSICIAN CONSULTED WITH THE DERMATOLOGY TEAM TO OBTAIN INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW BEST TO PROCEED.
Patient problems: Burn(s)
MAUDE report 24500182 ↗MalfunctionFeb 9, 2024Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure; Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT ROLL-OFF. A LEVEEN COACCESS WAS SELECTED FOR USE TO TREAT A CASE OF CANCER IN THE LIVER. WHEN ROLL-OFF WAS ATTEMPTED, IT WAS NOTED THAT IT TOOK LONGER THAN USUAL. BY INCREASING THE CAUTERIZATION RANGE IN STAGES, ROLL-OFF WAS POSSIBLE AT ABOUT 180 W WHEN THE RANGE WAS NARROW. HOWEVER, WHEN THE RANGE WAS INCREASED, ROLL-OFF DID NOT OCCUR, EVEN AT 200 W. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THIS DEVICE AND THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES AS A RESULT OF THE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18676171 ↗MalfunctionDec 22, 2020Failure to Unfold or Unwrap; Failure to Unfold or Unwrap
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DIFFICULTY TO EXTEND A NEEDLE OCCURRED. A RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON A LESION LOCATED IN THE LIVER. A 4.0 LEVEEN COACCESS ELECTRODE WAS ADVANCED TO THE LESION, BUT THE DEVICE DID NOT FULLY DEPLOY. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS RESULTED IN RELATION TO THIS EVENT AND THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 11055486 ↗MalfunctionOct 14, 2019Failure to Unfold or Unwrap; Failure to Unfold or Unwrap
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TINES OF THE ELECTRODE WERE DIFFICULT TO DEPLOY. A RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE OF THE LIVER WAS BEING PERFORMED. A LEVEEN COACCESS ELECTRODE WAS SELECTED FOR USE TO ABLATE THE RENAL TUMOR. IT WAS NOTED THERE WAS A BAD DEPLOYMENT OF THE TINES ON THE ELECTRODE. ANOTHER ELECTRODE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9186834 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2019Failure to Unfold or Unwrap; Failure to Unfold or Unwrap
IT WAS REPORTED THE TINES OF THE ELECTRODE WERE UNABLE TO EXTEND. A RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE OF THE LIVER WAS BEING PERFORMED. A LEVEEN COACCESS ELECTRODE WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED, BUT THE TINES OF THE ELECTRODE WOULD NOT EXTEND. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED THE USE OF STRONG FORCE, BUT WAS STILL UNABLE TO EXTEND THE TINES. ANOTHER ELECTRODE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY ABLATE THE LIVER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8821712 ↗MalfunctionJun 18, 2019Failure to Unfold or Unwrap; Failure to Unfold or Unwrap
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WASN'T ABLE TO DEPLOY THE DEVICE INSIDE THE RENAL TUMOR. A RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE WAS BEING PERFORMED ON A CYSTIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA TUMOR AND A 3.5CM LEVEEN NEEDLE ELECTRODE WAS INTENDED TO BE USED IN THE PROCEDURE. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THE DEVICE INSIDE THE RENAL TUMOR, IT WAS UNABLE TO DEPLOY. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED A 4CM LEVEEN NEEDLE ELECTRODE, BUT THIS DEVICE DID NOT DEPLOY EITHER. THE PROCEDURE WAS STOPPED AND NOT COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8707214 ↗MalfunctionFeb 14, 2019Failure to Unfold or Unwrap; Failure to Unfold or Unwrap
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLE WAS STUCK. A 4.0/15/15 LEVEEN COACCESS ELECTRODE WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN A RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE. PRIOR TO USE A FUNCTIONAL CHECK WAS PERFORMED OUTSIDE THE PATIENT. DURING THE CHECK, THE ELECTRODES DID NOT COME OUT PROPERLY; THEY WERE TWISTED OVER EACH OTHER. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8340975 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2018Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED A DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A PULMONARY RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. DURING REMOVAL OF THE PROBE, THE DISTAL PORTION (1 CM LONG) REMAINED STUCK TO THE PATIENT'S LUNG. THE PROCEDURE WAS STOPPED AND SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE DETACHED PORTION OF THE PROBE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8102046 ↗MalfunctionNov 16, 2017Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure; Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT INSUFFICIENT ROLL-OFF OCCURRED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION (RFA) TREATMENT. A 4.0/15/15 LEVEEN¿ COACCESS¿ ELECTRODE WAS USED; HOWEVER ROLL-OFF WAS UNABLE TO BE ACHIEVED. THE RIGHT STEPS WERE FOLLOWED AND THE PADS AND NEEDLES WERE PLACED ACCURATELY. THERE WERE NO ERRORS FOUND. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE NEEDLE FROM THE PATIENT, IT WAS COLD AND THERE WAS NO SIGN OF HEAT. THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPLETED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7037522 ↗
Other ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page