Megadyne 0039HRecalls & reported problems
Megadyne Medical Products, Inc. · Electrosurgical Pencil Button Switch Non Coated Blade Electrode 10 ft (3 m) cord Holster · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10614559100868), received between Aug 29, 2019 and Sep 16, 2021 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Flare or Flash” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Flare or Flash2
- Arcing of Electrodes1
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Human-Device Interface Problem1
- Self-Activation or Keying1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 16, 2021Arcing of Electrodes; Arcing of Electrodes
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE THREW OFF THE ELECTRIC SPARKS. NEXT (B)(6) MEDICALNEXT¿S ELECTRIC KNIFE WAS USED WITH THE DEVICE. THE SETTING VOLTAGE WAS 45·45, 40·40 WHEN IT SPARKED. COMPETITIVE GENERATOR WAS USED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12482385 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2021Self-Activation or Keying; Human-Device Interface Problem; Self-Activation or Keying; Human-Device Interface Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AFTER THE LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY WAS COMPLETED, THE DEVICE FUNCTIONED PROPERLY AT THE EARLY PART OF THE PROCEDURE. 0012M,0039H AND VIO300D (ERBE) WAS USED TOGETHER. THEN UNTIL USING THE DEVICE AGAIN, THEY WERE PLACED TOGETHER IN A VINYL BAG WITH THE OTHER ENERGY DEVICE AND SUCTION/IRRIGATION DEVICE. LIQUID AND BLOOD LEAKING FROM THE SUCTION/IRRIGATION DEVICE HAD ACCUMULATED IN A VINYL BAG. THE DEVICES WERE SOAKED IN LIQUID. THEN THE ACTIVATION SOUND WAS HEARD FROM THE VINYL BAG WHEN THE SURGEON TRIED TO USE THE DEVICE AT THE LATTER PART OF THE OPERATION. AT THIS TIME, THE FOOTSWITCH OR THE HAND SWITCH WAS NOT PRESSED. THE SURGEON THOUGHT SOMETHING WAS WRONG, AND THE MEGADYNE CABLE WAS PLUGGED IN AND OUT FROM THE VIO 300D. THE POWER STOPPED FLOWING WHEN IT¿S PULLED OUT, BUT WHEN IT¿S PLUGGED IN, THE POWER FLOWED ON ITS OWN. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS PLUGGING IN AND OUT THE CABLE, THE TIP OF THE MEGADYNE WAS TOUCHING THE PATIENT¿S ABDOMEN, AND THE PATIENT GOT A BURN ABOUT 8CM LONG. THE DOCTOR INFORMED THE PATIENT'S FAMILY ABOUT THE BURN AND GAVE SOME OINTMENT TO TAKE CARE OF IT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11673892 ↗MalfunctionNov 1, 2019Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP THAT, THERE WAS A FOREIGN MATTER IN EACH PACKAGE OF 0037H AND 0039H. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED FOR THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ONE 0037H AND ONE 0039H WILL BE RETURNING. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. AFFILIATE REFERENCE NUMBER: (B)(4). POTENTIAL VOC: PACKAGING FOREIGN MATTER.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9266289 ↗MalfunctionOct 22, 2019Flare or Flash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A HERNIA PROCEDURE THERE WAS A FLASH AT THE SURGICAL SITE. NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9221691 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2019Flare or Flash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MASS EXCISION THERE WAS A FLASH AS THE SURGICAL SITE FROM EITHER THE PENCIL OR THE TIP. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW THEY FINISHED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8946953 ↗
Other ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page