Harmonic LaparoSonic HDH05Recalls & reported problems
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC · Harmonic LaparoSonic Dissecting Hooks 5mm · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Ethicon Harmonic LaparoSonic HDH05 is a 5mm dissecting hook used in laparoscopic surgery to cut and coagulate tissue. Most of the 39 reports describe the blade or tip breaking apart during use, sometimes with parts coming loose or the tip heating up excessively. Nine injuries and no deaths were reported. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 39
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 39 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705036002109), received between Nov 20, 2017 and May 4, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries, 30 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (16 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation16
- Break8
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7
- Detachment Of Device Component3
- Failure to Read Input Signal2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Defective Component1
- Delivered as Unsterile Product1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions20
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient10
- Blood Loss3
- No Code Available3
- Injury2
- Urinary Frequency / Polyuria2
- Abscess1
- Atrial Fibrillation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 39 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 4, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY, THE FIBROID WAS TOO LARGE TO REMOVE, SO WHILE THE HDH05 WAS USED TO DIVIDE IT, THE BLADE SUDDENLY BROKE. THERE WERE NO UNUSUAL SOUNDS SUCH AS METALLIC SOUNDS AT ALL. NO PIECES WERE LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25073533 ↗MalfunctionMar 19, 2026Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN OB-GYN SURGERY, THE TIP WAS BROKEN. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24643050 ↗MalfunctionFeb 13, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY, THE TIP OF THE BLADE WAS BROKEN WHEN TRIED TO GRAB THE FIBROID IN A NORMAL WAY. THE BLADE WAS RETRIEVED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24332372 ↗MalfunctionJul 21, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, AFTER OPENING THE DEVICE AND THE DEVICE WAS ACTIVATED, THE BLADE BROKE SUDDENLY. THE BROKEN PART WAS ALL COLLECTED. NO PIECES WERE LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22554552 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2024Material Separation; Failure to Read Input Signal; Material Separation; Failure to Read Input Signal
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY, ¿TIGHTEN ASSEMBLY ¿WAS DISPLAYED AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE BLADE WAS BROKEN. THE DEVICE WAS USED AS USUAL, AND THE TISSUE WAS NO DIFFERENT FROM USUAL. THE DEVICE WAS USED ON UTERUS. NO PIECES WERE LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. GEN11 WAS USED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20039511 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT, WHEN CONNECTED TO THE GENERATOR, HAD THE FOLLOWING PROBLEM: RUPTURE OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TERMINAL HOOK, DURING ITS ACTIVATION, AT THE UTERINE MYOMA, DURING THE INTRA-ABDOMINAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19386695 ↗MalfunctionApr 5, 2024Excessive Heating; Excessive Heating
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, THE ROOT PART OF THE DEVICE HAD HEAT EXCESSIVELY AND WAS MELTED. THE DEVICE WAS USED AS USUAL. GEN11 WAS USED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19049913 ↗MalfunctionOct 9, 2023Difficult or Delayed Activation; Difficult or Delayed Activation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE THE TIP STOPPED WORKING. NO CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT REPORTED. TO PROCEDURE COMPLETED PHYSICIAN USED ANOTHER ONE PRODUCT THE SAME TYPE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17894365 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2023Material Separation; Failure to Disconnect; Material Separation; Failure to Disconnect
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE GLUED PART CAME OFF WHEN THE HOOK PART WAS HOOKED ON THE TISSUE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17452700 ↗MalfunctionJun 2, 2023Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, BEFORE AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THERE WAS A HOLE ON THE PACKAGE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17050343 ↗MalfunctionMar 8, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PIN CAME OFF. GEN11 WAS USED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16505287 ↗InjuryOct 4, 2022Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
TITLE: MINIMALLY INVASIVE CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING WITH ULTRASONICALLY SKELETONIZED INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY. AUTHOR: KAZUTOSHI TACHIBANA, MD, PHD,A KEITA KIKUCHI, MD, PHD,B KOUHEI NARAYAMA, MD,B AKIHITO OKAWA, MD,A YU IWASHIRO, MD,A AYAKA ARIHARA, MD,A AND AKIHIKO YAMAUCHI, MD, PHDB. CITATION: JTCVS TECHNIQUES C VOLUME 14, NUMBER C HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.XJTC.2022.05.010. THIS STUDY AIMS TO EXAMINED THE AUTHORS¿ INITIAL EXPERIENCE OF CONSECUTIVE CASES WITH MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (MICS CABG) USING ULTRASONICALLY SKELETONIZED INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY (ITA). FROM FEBRUARY 2012 TO MAY 2021, 247 PATIENTS (194 MALES AND 53 FEMALES) AGE 65.9 -11.5 YEAR UNDERWENT WITH MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (MICS CABG) AS PERFORMED BY 3 SURGEONS (K.K., A.Y., AND K.T.) AT MULTIPLE INSTITUTES. THE LEFT INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY (LITA) AND RIGHT INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY (RITA) WERE HARVESTED IN A FULL SKELETONIZED FASHION UNDER DIRECT VISION THROUGH AN 8- TO 10-CM LEFT MINITHORACOTOMY INCISION, AND OFF-PUMP MICS CABG (OPCAB) WAS DONE BASICALLY. DURING HARVESTING, THE RIGHT INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY (RITA) WAS HARV
Patient problems: Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Insufficient Information; Pleural Effusion
MAUDE report 15540022 ↗MalfunctionOct 3, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY THE HOOK ON THE END OF THE DEVICE BROKE IN HALF. A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE WITH NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15528146 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2022Material Separation; Noise, Audible; Material Separation; Noise, Audible
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN OB-GYN PROCEDURE, AN UNEXPECTED METALLIC SOUND WAS HEARD. THE BLADE WAS BROKEN. NO PIECES FELL INTO THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15321388 ↗MalfunctionApr 22, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE LAP SUPRACERVICAL HYSTERECTOMY, WHEN THE SURGEON WAS CUTTING THE CERVIX WITH THE BLADE, THE TIP OF THE DEVICE BROKE OFF. THE FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED. A LIKE DEVICES WAS USED TO COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE WITH NO PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14187773 ↗MalfunctionMar 18, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY PROCEDURE THAT WHILE DOING THE CULPOTOMY A RUMI WAS INSERTED INTO THE VAGINA WHEN THE BLADE TIP FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT. TIP WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE REMOVED WITH AN ENSEAL DEVICE TO REMOVE THROUGH THE TROCAR BUT WHEN INSPECTED THEY DID NOT SEE THE TIP IN THE JAWS OF THE ENSEAL. THEY PROCEEDED WITH AN X-RAY TO LOCATE THE TIP. THE TIP WAS NOT LOCATED WITH THE X-RAY. THEY THEN INSPECTED THE TROCAR AND FOUND THE TIP IN THE TROCAR HOUSING. UNKNOWN AS TO HOW THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13803111 ↗MalfunctionFeb 16, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE HOOK BROKE OFF WHILE THE DOCTOR WAS USING. CASE COMPLETED WITH A LIKE DEVICE. NO PATIENT HARM REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13545840 ↗MalfunctionDec 16, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN OB-GYN PROCEDURE THE DEVICE¿S BLADE BROKE DURING USE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13019834 ↗MalfunctionSep 23, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, BLADE BROKE DURING USE. NO PIECES FELL INTO THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12521427 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2021Material Separation; Failure to Read Input Signal; Material Separation; Failure to Read Input Signal
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE BLADE BROKE. NO PIECE FELL INTO THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12388634 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE BLADE BROKE . NO PIECE FELL INTO THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12388623 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2020Failure to Deliver Energy; Failure to Deliver Energy
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC OOPHORECTOMY, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT ACTIVATE AND COAGULATE DURING USE. GEN11 WAS USED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10051878 ↗MalfunctionFeb 24, 2020Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC OOPHORECTOMY, THE DEVICE BECAME NOT TO COAGULATE THE TARGET TISSUE ABOUT 30 MINUTES AFTER THE OPERATION STARTED. WHEN THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE HP WITH THE TORQUE WRENCH, THE TIP OF THE BLADE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO PIECES FELL INTO THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9745948 ↗InjuryJan 21, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
TITLE : LAPAROSCOPIC MITROFANOFF PROCEDURE IN CHILDREN: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFICULTIES AND BENEFITS. AUTHOR : THOMAS BLANC, CECILE MULLER, MAGUELONNE PONS, POURYA PASHOOTAN, ANNABEL PAYE-JAOUEN, ALAA EL GHONEIMI. CITATION: JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY (2015) 11, 28.E1-28.E8; DOI: HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JPUROL.2014.07.013. THIS RETROSPECTIVE STUDY DISCUSSED ABOUT THE FEASIBILITY AND POSSIBLE BENEFITS OF USING A LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH IN CHILDREN WITH SIGNIFICANT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFICULTY DOING EFFICIENT URETHRAL CATHETERIZATION. BETWEEN 2003 AND 2013, FULLY LAPAROSCOPIC MITROFANOFF (LMA) WAS ATTEMPTED IN 15 CHILDREN (MALE=12, FEMALE=3; MEAN AGE=9 YEARS). DURING THE PROCEDURE, A CAUDAL SUTURE BETWEEN THE APPENDIX AND THE BLADDER MUCOSA WAS INCLUDED THE DETRUSOR MUSCLE TO FIX THE CAUDAL PART OF THE ANASTOMOSIS AND STABILIZE THE ANASTOMOTIC LINE DURING SUTURING. AFTER COMPLETING THE ANASTOMOSIS, THE APPENDIX WAS PLACED IN THE NEWLY PREPARED DETRUSOR MUSCLE TROUGH, AND THE SEROMUSCULAR LAYER OF THE BLADDER WAS CLOSED OVER THE APPENDIX. TO AVOID COMPRESSION OF THE MESENTERY, THE SUTURES WERE DONE THROUGH THE MESENTERY UNDER LAPAROSCOPIC VISION, USING INTERRUPT
Patient problems: Urinary Frequency / Polyuria
MAUDE report 9612804 ↗InjuryJan 21, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
TITLE : LAPAROSCOPIC MITROFANOFF PROCEDURE IN CHILDREN: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFICULTIES AND BENEFITS AUTHOR : THOMAS BLANC, CECILE MULLER, MAGUELONNE PONS, POURYA PASHOOTAN, ANNABEL PAYE-JAOUEN, ALAA EL GHONEIMI. CITATION: JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY (2015) 11, 28.E1-28.E8; DOI: HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JPUROL.2014.07.013. THIS RETROSPECTIVE STUDY DISCUSSED ABOUT THE FEASIBILITY AND POSSIBLE BENEFITS OF USING A LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH IN CHILDREN WITH SIGNIFICANT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFICULTY DOING EFFICIENT URETHRAL CATHETERIZATION. BETWEEN 2003 AND 2013, FULLY LAPAROSCOPIC MITROFANOFF (LMA) WAS ATTEMPTED IN 15 CHILDREN (MALE=12, FEMALE=3; MEAN AGE=9 YEARS). DURING THE PROCEDURE, A CAUDAL SUTURE BETWEEN THE APPENDIX AND THE BLADDER MUCOSA WAS INCLUDED THE DETRUSOR MUSCLE TO FIX THE CAUDAL PART OF THE ANASTOMOSIS AND STABILIZE THE ANASTOMOTIC LINE DURING SUTURING. AFTER COMPLETING THE ANASTOMOSIS, THE APPENDIX WAS PLACED IN THE NEWLY PREPARED DETRUSOR MUSCLE TROUGH, AND THE SEROMUSCULAR LAYER OF THE BLADDER WAS CLOSED OVER THE APPENDIX. TO AVOID COMPRESSION OF THE MESENTERY, THE SUTURES WERE DONE THROUGH THE MESENTERY UNDER LAPAROSCOPIC VISION, USING INTERRUPTE
Patient problems: Urinary Frequency / Polyuria
MAUDE report 9612788 ↗
Other ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page