Snowden-Pencer 89-7202Recalls & reported problems
Steris Corporation · RESPOSABLE TITANIUM ENDO-RIGHT ANGLE SUCTION ELECTRODE 5MM, 32CM, 5 PER BOX · Class 2
All models of Snowden-Pencer (62)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10885403278648), received between Jul 13, 2023 and Jul 13, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Overheating of Device” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Overheating of Device1
Patient problems
- Burn(s)1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 13, 2023Overheating of Device; Overheating of Device
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT THE DEVICE DID NOT DO WHAT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO DO. VERBATIM: DESCRIBE THE EVENT OR PROBLEM: PATIENT WENT TO THE OPERATING ROOM FOR A VATS SYMPATHECTOMY ON [REDACTED DATE]. DURING THE CASE THE L HOOK IN THE THORACOSCOPY KIT (WHICH IS A REUSABLE LAPAROSCOPIC INSTRUMENT) WAS NOT NOTED TO BE MISSING INSULATION ON THE TIP. DURING THE PROCEDURE THIS RESULTED IN TWO SMALL BURN INJURIES TO THE LUNG. AFTER THE PROCEDURE IT WAS INSPECTED AND NOTED THAT THE CRACK WAS CIRCUMFERENTIAL HALFWAY AROUND THE INSTRUMENT. AFTER THE EVENT THE CUSTOMER WAS EVALUATED BY BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING WHO NOTED THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES OBSERVED DURING TESTING THAT WOULD BE CAUSE FOR CONCERN. TESTING INDICATES THE CUSTOMER WAS DELIVERING ENERGY INTO THE CIRCUIT AS IT WAS SET TO DO SO. WHAT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENDED PROCEDURE? VATS SYMPATHECTOMY WHAT PROBLEM DID THE USER HAVE (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :DEVICE MALFUNCTION - THAT IS, THE DEVICE DID NOT DO WHAT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO DO. DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? YES IS THIS A SINGLE-USE DEVICE THAT WAS REPROCESSED AND REUSED ON A PATIENT? NO (B)(6) 2023 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 1. WHAT WAS THE PATIENT¿S OUTCOME? THE PATIENT¿S PROCEDU
Patient problems: Burn(s)
MAUDE report 17320739 ↗
Other ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page