Skip to content

Olympus WA94002ARecalls & reported problems

OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Single Use Plasma Coagulation Probe Axial Argon PA-211U 2.3 x 2200 mm · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 14042761083420), received between Apr 24, 2023 and Sep 17, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Output Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Output Problem2
  • No Device Output1

Patient problems

  • Bowel Perforation2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 17, 2024No Device Output; No Device Output

    IT WAS REPORTED, THE PLASMA COAGULATION PROBE OUTPUT DID NOT START WHEN ATTEMPTING TO STOP BLEEDING. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AFTER SWITCHING TO THE SAME PRODUCT. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20236966 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2023Output Problem; Output Problem

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO OLYMPUS THAT DURING AN ATTEMPT TO COAGULATE AN ANGIODYSPLASIA IN THE COECUM USING THIS SINGLE USE PLASMA COAGULATION PROBE, THE PATIENT'S MUSCLES CONTRACTED WHEN THE FOOT SWITCH WAS ACTUATED. THE ARGON PROBE DID NOT IGNITE, AND NO COAGULATION WAS ACHIEVED ON THE SITE. THEN A CHANGE WAS MADE TO A NEW PROBE, AND THE SAME PROBLEMS OCCURRED AT THE SAME SPOT. IT WAS ONLY WHEN A SPOT ABOUT 5 CM AWAY FROM THE ORIGINAL SPOT WAS ACCESSED THAT IGNITION AND COAGULATION OCCURRED. IN THE EVENING, THE PATIENT WAS THEN FOUND TO HAVE A PERFORATION IN THE COECUM AT THE FIRST LOCATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE PATIENT HAD TO BE OPERATED BECAUSE OF THE PERFORATION BUT IS NOW SYMPTOM-FREE. THE PROBE WAS CHECKED FOR INTACTNESS AND RINSED 2 TIMES BEFORE THE EXAMINATION. NO ABNORMALITIES WERE FOUND. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF FURTHER PATIENT OR USER HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. PATIENT IDENTIFIERS: (B)(6) 1ST OF 2 PROBES USED. (B)(6) 2ND OF 2 PROBES USED. THIS REPORT IS FOR (B)(6).

    Patient problems: Bowel Perforation

    MAUDE report 16802846 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2023Output Problem; Output Problem

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO OLYMPUS THAT DURING AN ATTEMPT TO COAGULATE AN ANGIODYSPLASIA IN THE COECUM USING THIS SINGLE USE PLASMA COAGULATION PROBE, THE PATIENT'S MUSCLES CONTRACTED WHEN THE FOOT SWITCH WAS ACTUATED. THE ARGON PROBE DID NOT IGNITE, AND NO COAGULATION WAS ACHIEVED ON THE SITE. THEN A CHANGE WAS MADE TO A NEW PROBE, AND THE SAME PROBLEMS OCCURRED AT THE SAME SPOT. IT WAS ONLY WHEN A SPOT ABOUT 5 CM AWAY FROM THE ORIGINAL SPOT WAS ACCESSED THAT IGNITION AND COAGULATION OCCURRED. IN THE EVENING, THE PATIENT WAS THEN FOUND TO HAVE A PERFORATION IN THE COECUM AT THE FIRST LOCATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE PATIENT HAD TO BE OPERATED BECAUSE OF THE PERFORATION BUT IS NOW SYMPTOM-FREE. THE PROBE WAS CHECKED FOR INTACTNESS AND RINSED 2 TIMES BEFORE THE EXAMINATION. NO ABNORMALITIES WERE FOUND. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF FURTHER PATIENT OR USER HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. PATIENT IDENTIFIERS: (B)(6) 1ST OF 2 PROBES USED. (B)(6) 2ND OF 2 PROBES USED. THIS REPORT IS FOR (B)(6).

    Patient problems: Bowel Perforation

    MAUDE report 16802656 ↗

Other Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories devices

All Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page