Skip to content

Olympus WA22566SRecalls & reported problems

OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 14042761083765), received between Feb 6, 2020 and Feb 24, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 8, 2023Open, Classified

    Additional Caution statements in IFU: (1) Due to complaints where the loop wire at the distal end of the HF resection electrode broke after getting in contact with metal objects, such as other endoscopic equipment, implants or stents. As a result, fragments can fall inside the patient and must be retrieved. (2) The second Caution refers to the risk of sparkover when getting in contact with metal parts as this can cause uncontrolled heating of the HF-resection electrode and may result in damage and breakage to the HF-resection electrode tip

    Z-2413-2023 · Root cause: Process design · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Crack1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Fracture1
  • Fumes or Vapors1
  • Material Fragmentation1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Pain1
  • Perforation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 24, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THE RESECTION ELECTRODE BLUE AND YELLOW COATING PROTRUDED AND THE DISTAL END FELL OFF. THE ISSUE WAS FOUND DURING A TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION IN SALINE - VAPORIZATION, THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH AN OLYMPUS BACK-UP DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INJURY OR HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24437891 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 25, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THE HIGH FREQUENCY RESECTION ELECTRODE WAS DAMAGED. THE ISSUE WAS NOTICED WHEN IN THE PATIENT'S BLADDER DURING A TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOR PROCEDURE. A SECOND BUTTON WAS USED BUT HAD THE SAME FAULT WAS SEEN. THE SURGEON CONTINUED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH THE FAULTY ELECTRODE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM OR INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20303836 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2024Crack; Crack

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PLASMA OVAL BUTTON ELECTRODE HAD A CRACK/ SPLIT IN THE METAL. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20278948 ↗
  • InjuryDec 14, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC TRANSURETHRAL VAPORIZATION OF THE PROSTATE IN SALINE (TURISV) PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT'S LOWER ABDOMEN WAS FOUND TO BE FIRM AND A CHANGE IN VITAL SIGNS WAS OBSERVED. THIS WAS SUSPECTED TO HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY AN ACCUMULATION OF SALINE IN THE LOWER ABDOMEN CAUSED BY A PERFORATION IN THE URINARY TRACT THAT OCCURRED DURING THE TURISV PROCEDURE ALLOWING SALINE TO ENTER THE PERITONEAL CAVITY, WHICH HOWEVER HAS NOT BEEN CONFIRMED SO FAR. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THE SAME SET OF EQUIPMENT AND THERE WAS NO REPORT OF A MALFUNCTION OF ANY OF THE OLYMPUS DEVICES USED.

    Patient problems: Perforation

    MAUDE report 13001091 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 3, 2020Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem

    OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC PROSTATE ENUCLEATION PROCEDURE, THE BUTTON AT THE DISTAL END OF THE HF RESECTION ELECTRODE BROKE OFF AND FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT. HOWEVER, NO FRAGMENT REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT SINCE IT WAS REPORTEDLY RETRIEVED. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER HF ELECTRODE AND THERE WAS NO REPORT ABOUT AN ADVERSE EVENT OR PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9779553 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2020Fumes or Vapors; Fumes or Vapors

    THE SERVICE CENTER WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A TRANS URETHRAL VAPORIZATION OF PROSTATE (TURP) PROCEDURE, THE ANESTHETIST WAS OVERCOME BY FUMES DURING PLASMA BUTTON USE AND COMPLAINED OF PLEURITIC PAIN FOR THREE DAYS FOLLOWING THE INCIDENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ODOR IN THE OPERATING THEATRE WAS MUCH STRONGER THAN NORMAL FOR PLASMA BUTTON USE. THE ODOR OCCURRED WITH TWO OF FACILITY¿S NEW SURGEONS. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH SAME DEVICE. THE ANESTHETIST DID NOT SEEK MEDICAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERED AT HOME.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 9676408 ↗

Other Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories devices

All Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page