SYSTEM 2450 60-2450-220Recalls & reported problems
Conmed Corporation · SYSTEM 2450 220 VAC 50/60 Hz Electrosurgical Unit · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 20653405058158), received between Jun 20, 2024 and Jun 20, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 20, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
UPDATE: PER INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 20JUN24 THERE WAS NO REPORT FROM THE HOSPITAL FOR EQUIPMENT ALARMS SOUNDING DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE DEVICE, 60-2450-220, SYSTEM 2450, 220V, WAS BEING USED ON (B)(6) 2024 DURING A BLEPHAROPLASTY) AND ¿WHEN ACTIVATING THE SCALPEL, ACCORDING TO THE MEDICAL TEAM, THE SCALPEL PEN HAD A VERY STRONG FLAME, THE BLEND WAS AT A POWER OF 20 AND LOWERED TO 15 AND EVEN SO THE FLAME WHEN ACTIVATING THE PEN WAS STRONG. THE SCALPEL CARRIAGE WAS CHANGED. THE BLEND WAS REDUCED TO 10, AND WHEN USING THE SCALPEL PEN, A FLAME OF FIRE FORMED ON THE PATIENT'S FACE. THE PATIENT IS STABLE, RECEIVING DUE CARE ADMINISTERED BY THE HOSPITAL, THE BURNS ARE 2ND DEGREE IN THE REGION, CONTINUING TO THE NASAL SEPTUM. PEN USED IN OUR EQUIPMENT: SCALPEL PEN LOT: 240083 BRANDS: GABISA MEDICAL INTERNACIONAL S.A.¿. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A VALLEYLAB MEDTRONIC AND THERE WAS A 3 HOUR DELAY. PER FURTHER ASSESSMENT, IT WAS FOUND THAT BURN TREATMENT WITH SPECIAL COVERINGS WAS NECESSARY. AS OF (B)(6) 2024 THE PATIENT WAS IN TREATMENT OF THE INJURY AND ENT EVALUATION. THE PATENT DID NOT REQUIRE PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. THI
Patient problems: Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 19578251 ↗
Other ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page