Skip to content

SYSTEM 2450 60-2450-220Recalls & reported problems

Conmed Corporation · SYSTEM 2450 220 VAC 50/60 Hz Electrosurgical Unit · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 20653405058158), received between Jun 20, 2024 and Jun 20, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 20, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    UPDATE: PER INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 20JUN24 THERE WAS NO REPORT FROM THE HOSPITAL FOR EQUIPMENT ALARMS SOUNDING DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE DEVICE, 60-2450-220, SYSTEM 2450, 220V, WAS BEING USED ON (B)(6) 2024 DURING A BLEPHAROPLASTY) AND ¿WHEN ACTIVATING THE SCALPEL, ACCORDING TO THE MEDICAL TEAM, THE SCALPEL PEN HAD A VERY STRONG FLAME, THE BLEND WAS AT A POWER OF 20 AND LOWERED TO 15 AND EVEN SO THE FLAME WHEN ACTIVATING THE PEN WAS STRONG. THE SCALPEL CARRIAGE WAS CHANGED. THE BLEND WAS REDUCED TO 10, AND WHEN USING THE SCALPEL PEN, A FLAME OF FIRE FORMED ON THE PATIENT'S FACE. THE PATIENT IS STABLE, RECEIVING DUE CARE ADMINISTERED BY THE HOSPITAL, THE BURNS ARE 2ND DEGREE IN THE REGION, CONTINUING TO THE NASAL SEPTUM. PEN USED IN OUR EQUIPMENT: SCALPEL PEN LOT: 240083 BRANDS: GABISA MEDICAL INTERNACIONAL S.A.¿. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A VALLEYLAB MEDTRONIC AND THERE WAS A 3 HOUR DELAY. PER FURTHER ASSESSMENT, IT WAS FOUND THAT BURN TREATMENT WITH SPECIAL COVERINGS WAS NECESSARY. AS OF (B)(6) 2024 THE PATIENT WAS IN TREATMENT OF THE INJURY AND ENT EVALUATION. THE PATENT DID NOT REQUIRE PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. THI

    Patient problems: Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn

    MAUDE report 19578251 ↗

Other ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES devices

All ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page