Skip to content

EDGE AES-50SPRecalls & reported problems

Conmed Corporation · Edge Hip Probe, 50°, 18 cm · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20653405988332), received between May 18, 2023 and Apr 15, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Fragmentation3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 15, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER, THAT THE AES-50SP, AES-50SP EDGE HIP PROBE 50 DEGREE WAS BEING USED DURING A HIP ARTHROSCOPY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 DATE WHEN IT WAS REPORTED ¿THE HEAD OF THE PROBE FELL OFF AFTER JUST USING THE PROBE". THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION TO THE PATIENT OR USER. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19103954 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 25, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    THIS COMPLAINT WAS CREATED DUE TO THE RECEIPT OF A MEDWATCH REPORT (MW5117479) RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2023. A SEARCH OF THE COMPLAINT SYSTEM HAS NOT FOUND A COMPLAINT REPORTED FOR THIS DEVICE/LOT NUMBER DURING THIS TIMEFRAME. THE REPORT WAS FOUND TO BE WRITTEN AGAINST THE AES-50SP PARADIGM EDGE HIP PROBE. THE REPORT STATES THAT ON (B)(6) 2023 ¿WHILE USING PARADIGM HIP PROBE, A PIECE BECAME DISLODGED FROM PROBE AND HAD TO BE REMOVED. RETRIEVAL OF THE FOREIGN BODY CAUSED A 1 HOUR DELAY.¿. THERE WAS INJURY OR IMPACT TO THE PATIENT OR USER. FURTHER ASSESSMENT COULD NOT BE SENT AS THE REPORTER DID NOT IDENTIFY HIMSELF/HERSELF, OR THE FACILITY WHERE THE EVENT OCCURRED. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17001589 ↗
  • InjuryMay 18, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE AES-50SP PARADIGM EDGE HIP PROBE, 50 DEGREE WAS BEING USED ON (B)(6) 2023 DURING A HIP ARTHROSCOPY PROCEDURE AND ¿CIRCULAR METAL FACE OF THE PROBE FELL OFF FROM THE HANDPIECE AND INTO THE JOINT. IT TOOK 2 HOURS TO TRY AND GET IT OUT OF THE JOINT. CAUSED A MAJOR DELAY IN SURGERY BUT NO PATIENT HARM. PATIENT INJURY? NO, BIGGER INCISION THOUGH.¿. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. AFTER FURTHER ASSESSMENT IT WAS FOUND THAT THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED. THERE WAS NO EXTENDED STAY AT THE HOSPITAL FOR THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED DUE TO THE REPORTED INJURY OF A LARGER INCISION WAS NEEDED TO RETRIEVE THE FRAGMENTS FROM THE PATIENT

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16952700 ↗

Other Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories devices

All Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page