Venclose System EVSRF Catheter VC10A256F100Recalls & reported problems
Venclose Inc · Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Catheter, 100cm · Class 2
All models of Venclose System EVSRF Catheter (2)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
Quick summary
This Venclose radiofrequency ablation catheter is used to close varicose veins by applying heat inside the vein. Most of the 52 reports describe the catheter failing to heat during treatment, generator error messages, and the catheter sticking and being hard to remove from the vein, along with burns, swelling and blood clots in the treated leg. Reports mention 30 injuries and no deaths. One open recall, started in September 2024, covers catheters made with two signal wires soldered to the wrong circuit board ports, which limits where heat is delivered.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 52
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 31
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 52 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00858254006015), received between Aug 2, 2020 and Jul 13, 2026 — classified as 31 injuries, 21 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Communication or Transmission Problem” (14 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K160754, K252316); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Sep 4, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified
The Venclose" RF Ablation Catheters may have been manufactured with internal wiring error. The red and yellow signal wires were soldered on swapped ports of the catheter PCB. This error in wire configuration would lead to power being applied through the proximal 3/4th of the heating coil, bypassing the thermocouple, which will then cause the generator to overdrive the catheter in an attempt to reach desired temperature set point. The wire attachment error causes the device to reach temperatures exceeding the levels intended for therapeutic efficacy, while the console is falsely indicating that temperature has not yet been reached, thus increasing the risk of harm due to excessive temperature.
Z-0371-2025 · Root cause: Employee error · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem26
- Communication or Transmission Problem14
- Inappropriate or Unexpected Reset5
- Excessive Heating4
- Difficult to Remove2
- Material Separation2
- Overheating of Device2
- Thermal Decomposition of Device2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions20
- Thrombosis/Thrombus11
- Burn(s)7
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available5
- Pain4
- Swelling/ Edema3
- Arrhythmia1
- Chest Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 52 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 13, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
On (b)(6)2026, a patient underwent a radiofrequency ablation procedure using the Venclose catheter. Following the procedure, the patient experienced second degree burns and presented to a general practitioner the following day. The patient status is unknown.
Patient problems: Burn(s)
MAUDE report 25794280 ↗InjuryMar 13, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF THE CLINICAL TRAIL (B)(4) OF A VENCLOSE DEVICE, THAT POST ENDOVENOUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE ON THE TARGET LEFT LIMB GREATER SAPHENOUS VEIN, THE SUBJECT WAS OBSERVED WITH OCCLUSION ON THE TARGET VESSEL AND UNDERWENT ADJUNCTIVE PROCEDURE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT, APPROXIMATELY FOUR MONTHS AND TWENTY-NINE DAYS LATER ON (B)(6) 2025, THE SUBJECT HAD EDEMA. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 24594138 ↗MalfunctionFeb 27, 2026Communication or Transmission Problem; Packaging Problem
A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR SCREEN DISPLAYED A RED X POPPED UP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24467854 ↗MalfunctionFeb 27, 2026Communication or Transmission Problem
A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR SCREEN DISPLAYED A RED X POPPED UP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24467801 ↗MalfunctionFeb 27, 2026Communication or Transmission Problem
A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR SCREEN DISPLAYED A RED X POPPED UP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24467800 ↗MalfunctionFeb 27, 2026Communication or Transmission Problem
A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR SCREEN DISPLAYED A RED X POPPED UP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24467798 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143436 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143435 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143433 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143432 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143233 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143231 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143230 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143229 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143227 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ACCOUNT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE EHITS FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WITH NEWLY REINTRODUCED CATHETERS, TOTALING AT LEAST SIX INCIDENTS IN THE PAST MONTH. ALL CATHETERS USED WERE NEW SINCE MARKET RETURN. RVT CONFIRMED APPLYING PRESSURE ALONG THE CATHETER¿S HEATING ELEMENT DURING TREATMENT, WITH TWO BURNS NOTED AT THE PROXIMAL END. PRE TREATMENT MEASUREMENTS AVERAGED 6.8 CM FROM THE TERMINAL VALVE AT THE SFJ TO THE CATHETER TIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24143015 ↗MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR ALLEGEDLY DISPLAYED "ERROR 51 WITH RED X" CODE WHEN CATHETER WAS PLUGGED INTO GENERATOR. THE CATHETER WAS USING SOFTWARE VERSION 3.35 THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23644507 ↗MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR ALLEGEDLY DISPLAYED "ERROR 51 WITH RED X" CODE WHEN CATHETER WAS PLUGGED INTO GENERATOR. THE CATHETER WAS USING SOFTWARE VERSION 3.35 THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23644494 ↗MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR ALLEGEDLY DISPLAYED "ERROR 51 WITH RED X" CODE WHEN CATHETER WAS PLUGGED INTO GENERATOR. THE CATHETER WAS USING SOFTWARE VERSION 3.35 THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23644493 ↗MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR ALLEGEDLY DISPLAYED "ERROR 51 WITH RED X" CODE WHEN CATHETER WAS PLUGGED INTO GENERATOR. THE CATHETER WAS USING SOFTWARE VERSION 3.35 THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23644490 ↗MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR ALLEGEDLY DISPLAYED "ERROR 51 WITH RED X" CODE WHEN CATHETER WAS PLUGGED INTO GENERATOR. THE CATHETER WAS USING SOFTWARE VERSION 3.35 THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23644489 ↗MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR ALLEGEDLY DISPLAYED "ERROR 51 WITH RED X" CODE WHEN CATHETER WAS PLUGGED INTO GENERATOR. THE CATHETER WAS USING SOFTWARE VERSION 3.35 THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23644487 ↗MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR ALLEGEDLY DISPLAYED "ERROR 51 WITH RED X" CODE WHEN CATHETER WAS PLUGGED INTO GENERATOR. THE CATHETER WAS USING SOFTWARE VERSION 3.35 THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23644485 ↗MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE USING THE VENCLOSE CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GENERATOR ALLEGEDLY DISPLAYED "ERROR 51 WITH RED X" CODE WHEN CATHETER WAS PLUGGED INTO GENERATOR. THE CATHETER WAS USING SOFTWARE VERSION 3.35 THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23644484 ↗InjuryOct 30, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL THAT APPROXIMATELY THREE MONTHS AND FOUR DAYS LATER POST RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT REPORTEDLY HAD CHEST PAIN. LATER THE PATIENT ALSO UNDERWENT ROBOT-ASSIST KNEE REPLACEMENT. THE ADVERSE EVENT OF CHEST PAIN WAS NOT RELATED TO THE DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Chest Pain
MAUDE report 23422214 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K160754, K252316. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2638-2025 · Aug 21, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedVenclose digiRF Generators, Model VCRFG1, with software 3.35 designed to identify internal wiring anomalies in the Venclose EVSRF Ablation Catheter prior to use. The Venclose digiR
Other Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories devices
- Vasoview Hemopro 2 VH-4000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories6 recalls1 death3,232 reports
- LigaSure LF1937Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories3 deaths2,090 reports
- Olympus WB91051WOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories1 death1,951 reports
- Valleylab FT10 VLFT10GENCovidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories1 recall5 deaths1,062 reports
- LigaSure LF1837Covidien LP · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES1 recall967 reports
- LigaSure LF2019Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories948 reports
- VAPR 225028Depuy Mitek, LLC · ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES895 reports
- LigaSure LF1923Covidien LP · Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories855 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page